• Elon Musk’s decision to move X to Texas’ Bastrop County is seen as a strategic move that places the platform under Texas law – which is more favorable to free speech and less tolerant of censorship. This shift could provide legal cover for Musk to address alleged illegal activities within the company.
• Key figures in the potential legal and political drama include Bastrop County District Attorney Bryan Goertz and Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton. Raiklin advocates for briefing these officials to investigate the platform’s operations and potential criminal activities, framing the move as an opportunity to “clean out the crime scene.”
• Goertz has the authority to investigate X’s operations now that it is headquartered in his jurisdiction, while Paxton has a history of challenging Big Tech and advocating for free speech despite his own challenges. Raiklin believes a collaborative effort involving Musk, Paxton and local law enforcement could lead to a groundbreaking investigation.
• The X Direct Messages (DMs) are highlighted as a critical piece of evidence, potentially containing incriminating information. Raiklin cites the case of Terry Adirim, a Department of Defense official, and journalist Matt Taibbi’s reluctance to access DMs as indicators of the significance of this evidence.
• The investigation could expose Deep State operatives involved in election interference and censorship. Raiklin and Adams call for Texans and those affected by censorship to support the effort, emphasizing the importance of legal, moral and ethical actions to restore transparency and accountability to X.

As Elon Musk continues to reshape the social media landscape with his acquisition of Twitter (now X), a new drama unfolds in the heart of Texas. According to Deep State whistleblower Ivan Raiklin, the relocation of X to Bastrop County has presented Musk an opportunity to “clean out a crime scene.”

In a “Health Ranger Report” interview with Mike Adams, Raiklin said Bastrop County District Attorney (DA) Bryan Goertz and Texas Attorney General (AG) Ken Paxton are in position to help Musk accomplish that.

“Those are individuals that need to be briefed on the opportunity for them to go ahead and help Musk look under the hood. Remember when Elon said X is a social media company and a crime scene? Well, now the crime scene is in their county, in their jurisdiction, and so we can potentially help out and helping them sift through Jim Baker’s holdings that X has,” Raiklin said, pertaining to the social media platform’s former deputy general counsel.

“We’re not suing X. We’re not suing Elon. We’re basically helping facilitate Elon clean out the crime scene.”

Musk’s decision to move X to Bastrop County is not just a corporate relocation; it is a strategic gambit with far-reaching implications. According to Raiklin, the move places X under the jurisdiction of Texas law, which is more favorable to free speech and less tolerant of censorship. This shift could provide Musk with the legal cover he needs to uncover and address the alleged illegal activities that have long been hidden within X’s digital walls.

Goertz is a crucial figure in this unfolding drama. With X now headquartered in his jurisdiction, the Bastrop County DA has the authority to investigate the platform’s operations and any potential criminal activities. Raiklin emphasized the importance of briefing Goertz and other local law enforcement officials to ensure they are prepared to handle the “crime scene” that X has become.

Meanwhile, Paxton has a history of challenging Big Tech companies and advocating for free speech despite facing his own challenges. Raiklin believes that a collaborative effort involving Musk, Paxton and local law enforcement could lead to a groundbreaking investigation into X’s alleged illegal activities, including election interference and censorship.

Potential investigation could expose Deep State’s involvement in censorship

Raiklin’s strategy involves multiple fronts to facilitate the investigation and ensure that the evidence is brought to light. The former Green Beret and constitutional attorney suggested that Musk should reach out to Paxton and State Sen. Bryan Hughes (R-Mineola), who chairs the committee that recently held hearings on Big Tech whistleblowers. This multi-pronged approach aims to create a demand signal for transparency and accountability, leveraging both legal and public opinion mechanisms.

One of the most critical pieces of evidence lies in X Direct Messages (DMs). He cited the case of former Department of Defense official Terry Adirim, who blocked him after he and his network tagged her on X – leading to the deletion of her account.

Raiklin believes Adirim’s actions indicate that her DMs contain incriminating information. Additionally, journalist Matt Taibbi’s reluctance to access X DMs due to a signed agreement further suggests that these messages could be a gold mine of evidence. (Related: Whistleblower docs expose key tactics of the censorship industrial complex: Matt Taibbi.)

The potential investigation could have far-reaching implications, exposing Deep State operatives and their involvement in everything from election interference to censorship. Raiklin and Adams urged Texans and those impacted by the censorship industrial complex to join in the effort to bring transparency and accountability to X. They emphasized the importance of legal, moral and ethical actions, calling for a peaceful and patriotic approach to addressing the issues at hand.

Follow BigTech.news for more news about social media platforms.

Watch the full interview between Ivan Raiklin and the Health Ranger Mike Adams on the “Health Ranger Report” below.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Ivan Raiklin nails it, asks Fauci the burning question – WATCH.

Twitter yielding to more government CENSORSHIP demands under Musk leadership.

Elon Musk changes X algorithm after getting ratioed for demanding more H-1B visas.

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

Raiklin.com