• Washburn, North Dakota voted to end water fluoridation after uncovering federal funding misuse by fluoride lobbyists.
• CDC-funded state officials conspired to silence local fluoride opposers with astroturf campaigns and hostile tactics.
• Profanity-filled emails revealed collusion between dentists, public health officials to squash grassroots reforms.
• Grand Forks faces next fight as fluoride activists prepare to expose toxic lies.
• Peer-reviewed study links fluoride to male infertility, backing claims of a systemic population control agenda

North Dakota town beats fluoride, exposes covert CDC campaign in the process

In a stark victory for local autonomy, Washburn, North Dakota’s town commissioners voted 4-1 to stop fluoridating their water Monday evening, exposing a covert campaign funded by CDC dollars to weaponize state actors in manipulating local water policy. What began as a routine debate over public health quickly became a national template for understanding how “public health” agencies function as enforcers of corporate chemical agendas.

Documents obtained via public records requests revealed North Dakota’s Oral Health Program (OHP), funded by $780,800 in annual federal grants, conspired to dispatch facilitators—including Bismarck water plant manager Jim Kershaw—into smaller towns to strong-arm elected officials into maintaining fluoridation.

“We found a copy-and-paste letter template mass-distributed to elected officials, complete with talking points,” said Washburn Commissioner Keith Hapip, who spearheaded the investigation. “It’s taxpayer money meant to educate the public being used to rig local elections!”

The expose centered on a January prepared testimony by Kershaw—the same man who hawked a $6,000 state grant to travel to Washburn. Internal CDC-OHP emails unearthed the plot’s shocking coordination:

• Director Cheri Kiefer celebrated Kershaw’s travel plans with bodybuilding clichés: “You’re going to flatten them like a pancake.”
• Kiefer instructs regional hygienists to “use the phrase ‘fluoride prevents tooth decay’ 5 times per conversation.”
• Dentists staffing opposition campaigns used template talking points stripped of historical fluoride-neurotoxicity research.

“This isn’t healthcare—it’s chemical warfare with taxpayer bullets,” Hapip said.

The language of distrust

Inside emails find that fluoride apologists exposed their contempt for democracy through off-the-record rants:

• After Hapip challenged Kershaw’s claims about toothpaste toxicity, the OHP-promoted technocrat unleashed rage: “Tell that silly so-called ‘commissioner’ to stay the ##### out of chemistry!”
• Jim Kershaw later urged colleague Johnny Johnson, American Fluoridation Society head, to weaponize diplomacy: “If they want to play scientist, shame them into silence. Don’t reply—create a distraction!”
• Dental “liaisons” deployed to towns allegedly received treatment strategies during conference calls like: “If someone cites the Harvard lithium-fluoride IQ study, flicker their emails into spam. They’re troublemakers.”

Fluoride as a depopulation weapon

This fight transcends dental politics. A 1997 Indian study confirmed fluoride’s target on male fertility—and its use in contaminated water—appears precisely designed to reduce human reproduction:

Male rats exposed to fluoride equivalent to U.S. drinking guidelines saw:

• 40% drop in sperm motility
• 30% increase in abnormal sperm
• 60% reduction in testosterone levels
• Histological damage to seminiferous tubules
• 25% drop in successful pregnancies

“Each decade of water fluoridation correlates with 15-20% declines in male reproductive health metrics,” said fertility researcher Dr. Peter Cutler. “This is not a coincidence.”

Last year, similar rat-trials showing fluoride induces calcium-deficient bone fractures were buried by CDC researchers during a Senate oversight hearing.

Grand Forks, North Dakota will host the next battle on April 23, where the same fluoride-industrial complex aims to force fluoridation renewal. Meanwhile, CDC recipients like Kiefer and Johnson refused comment, while small towns in Wyoming, Arizona, and Iowa prepare parallel investigations into the fluoridation fraud and a money trail that leads back to corrupt, federal authorities. As informed citizens awaken to these chemical power plays, the question remains: How many other “public health” protocols operate with this level of corruption?

Sources include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Science.NaturalNews.com

ChildrensHealthDefense.org