Posted on Tuesday, June 24, 2025
|
by Ben Solis
|
31 Comments
|
The last two weeks have proven why Trump’s “Golden Dome” missile defense shield is critical for U.S. national security and upgrading America’s aging defense infrastructure in the face of emerging threats.
While all attention has now turned to the daring U.S. raid to destroy Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities over the weekend, the missile exchanges between Israel and Iran that precipitated the attack should not be forgotten. Although Iran was undoubtedly on the losing end of the hostilities, several Iranian missiles still managed to punch through Israel’s Iron Dome and strike targets in Tel Aviv, Jerusalem, and other cities. More missile attacks following the U.S. bombing campaign also damaged buildings in Israel.
Israel’s war with Iran, dubbed Operation “Am KaLavi” (Rising Lion), began on June 13. On its first night, over 200 Israeli fighter jets struck about 100 targets across Iran, deploying more than 330 munitions. The targets included nuclear facilities, military bases, and missile systems – but carefully avoided civilian centers. Iranian social media confirmed this restraint, showing videos of intact neighborhoods even as missiles rained down nearby.
Iran responded by launching about 200 missiles and 40 drones in six waves aimed at central Israel’s population centers, including Haifa and Tel Aviv. According to the Israel Defense Forces, roughly ten missiles managed to break through Israel’s multi-layered missile defense system in the first round of attacks. That breach proved costly.
In Bat Yam, just south of Tel Aviv, a missile struck a ten-story apartment building. The blast wave damaged 61 surrounding buildings—21 of which had to be demolished. Over 1,000 families were left homeless. A missile that hit Haifa sparked fires and building collapses. Another struck a children’s rehabilitation center in Pardes Katz, impacting care for over 3,000 children.
Though Israel’s three-tiered system—Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow 3—intercepted more than 95 percent of the missiles, the few that got through were devastating. Israeli emergency services reported 24 dead, 1,290 wounded, and over 10,000 evacuated. The attacks offered a harsh reminder: even the best defenses aren’t perfect.
That’s precisely why Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” is not just visionary—it’s urgently needed.
Unlike the Iron Dome, which primarily intercepts short- and medium-range threats, the Golden Dome is a bold step toward a next-generation U.S. missile defense system that would combine space-based sensors, high-powered lasers, and hypersonic interceptors. In May, Trump finalized the selection of a $175 billion Golden Dome design and appointed a Space Force general to lead the project. The goal: to create a missile defense network that can neutralize threats from anywhere—be they ballistic missiles from China, hypersonics from Russia, or nuclear drones from rogue states like Iran.
The Israeli-Iranian exchange showed that even today’s state-of-the-art defenses can be overwhelmed by modern weaponry. While Iran’s missiles were powerful, America’s peer adversaries possess even more advanced weapons. China and Russia are developing maneuverable hypersonic missiles capable of evading conventional defenses. Meanwhile, America’s missile defense architecture—still reliant on aging ground-based interceptors and Cold War-era systems—is woefully behind.
If Iran can damage Israel despite its cutting-edge systems, what might a Chinese or Russian salvo do to Los Angeles or New York? What does that mean for American deterrence to avoid war?
Trump’s Golden Dome initiative reflects a strategic leap, echoing the Reagan-era Strategic Defense Initiative but with modern capabilities. It’s not just about shooting down missiles—it’s about regaining the technological high ground in an increasingly dangerous world. The project would integrate with existing systems like Aegis and THAAD while expanding America’s reach into space and cyberspace. It also reflects a broader strategic truth: wise nations learn from the experiences of others.
Israel’s ability to avoid mass casualties, even amid some damage, was not luck. It was the result of relentless investment in layered defense, citizen preparedness, and real-time coordination between military and emergency services. Over 10,000 air raid alarms were triggered in the first week alone, but thanks to Israel’s Home Front Command—its civil defense corps—casualties remained far lower than they could have been.
As retired IDF Brigadier General Shachar Shohat explained, “The Israeli people have been very disciplined in reaching shelters promptly. This results in a relatively small number of casualties. They provide us with the capability and confidence that we can prevail.”
America would be wise to take note.
The United States currently lacks both the missile defense infrastructure and civil preparedness to respond to a large-scale attack. Our metropolitan areas are soft targets. Our early warning systems are fragmented. And our political class has, for decades, underinvested in missile defense while enemies caught up.
President Trump is changing that.
The Golden Dome isn’t a luxury—it’s a necessity. Trump’s decision to make it a national priority may one day prove as pivotal as Reagan’s Cold War buildup that led to the downfall of the Soviet Union. This is not just about staying ahead of the curve—it’s about staying alive in an era of 21st-century threats.
The war in Israel is a warning shot. The next one may not be so far away—or so easily contained.
Ben Solis is the pen name of an international affairs journalist, historian, and researcher.
Read full article here