It’s no secret that Gen Z is emerging as one of the most important voting blocs in American politics. As seen in the 2024 election, young voters between the ages of 18 and 29 shifted significantly away from Democrats and toward Republicans—a historic political realignment that has stunned pundits on both sides of the aisle.
But while the shift is cause for hope among conservatives, it has also revealed a growing divide within the conservative movement itself that falls largely along generational lines.
Older conservatives, shaped by the Cold War and Reagan’s triumph over Soviet communism, tend to adhere to a limited government philosophy rooted in distrust of federal power. In contrast, younger conservatives often embrace a more assertive role for government—not because they’ve rejected conservative values, but because they see different tools as necessary to defend them.
A 2020 Pew Research poll found that 70 percent of Gen Z believes the government should do more to promote the values they believe in, compared to 53 percent of Gen X and just 49 percent of Baby Boomers. A 2024 study by the Berkeley Institute for Young Americans reinforced this finding, noting that both “young liberals and young conservatives want effective government action to solve challenges.”
But this phenomenon isn’t a rejection of conservatism—it’s a reinterpretation of it. Whereas older conservatives often reflexively oppose government involvement (for good reason), younger conservatives increasingly see government as a potential tool to restore family stability, secure national identity, and rebuild traditional cultural norms.
The generational rift isn’t just about the role of government. It also reflects divergent priorities. According to recent polling from CIRCLE and Pew Research, younger conservatives are far more concerned about issues like the environment and mental health than their older ideological brethren. That’s not to say younger conservatives are climate change fanatics like their liberal counterparts. But they are more likely to support action by agencies like the EPA to target polluters, take seriously the dangers of social media and AI, and emphasize the need for the government to promote economic opportunity.
Of course, these differences can lead to tension. Older conservatives sometimes dismiss Gen Z as entitled or naive, while younger conservatives blame older generations for economic and cultural decay. Neither view is helpful—and both ignore a fundamental truth: the vast majority of conservatives want the same things.
Conservatives of every generation want to make it easier to get a job, get married, start a family, and pursue the American Dream. They want to preserve traditional values, protect the dignity of work, and hand off a freer, more stable, more prosperous nation to the next generation. The only real difference is how each group thinks we should get there.
It’s time to reframe the narrative. Instead of fighting over tactics, conservatives should recognize that generational differences are just different paths to a shared destination. That doesn’t mean papering over real disagreements – it means engaging in conversation with humility, honesty, and good faith. Every generation of conservatives has something to offer to the movement.
Gen Z conservatives didn’t grow up during the Cold War. They didn’t see the horrors of Marxism firsthand or experience the economic miracle of Reagan’s free-market revolution.
Their worldview was shaped instead by the aftermath of 9/11, endless foreign wars, the 2008 financial crisis, the COVID-19 lockdowns, and the rise of progressive extremism in schools, media, and government. These events have made many young people deeply distrustful of institutions – yet deeply hungry for stability, order, and truth.
This perspective should not be dismissed. It should be welcomed.
Indeed, younger conservatives are already leading a countercultural rebellion against the radical left. They are building new information platforms, creating independent media, and using their digital fluency to push back against the woke zeitgeist. Their entrepreneurial spirit and instinct for disruption can breathe new life into the conservative movement.
At the same time, young conservatives need the wisdom of their predecessors. Gen Z may be more tech-savvy, but they don’t yet have the life experience that older conservatives bring to the table. Boomers and Gen Xers have fought and won important battles for freedom, prosperity, and national identity. Their hard-earned lessons are an essential resource for the next generation.
That’s why every generation needs each other.
If older conservatives want their legacy to endure, they should embrace young conservatives not as rebels to be reined in, but as heirs to be guided. And if Gen Z wants to chart a better future, they must resist the temptation to become cynical about their elders and instead learn from them.
The future of the conservative movement will not be built on purity tests or intergenerational finger-pointing. It will be built on solidarity – a recognition that we are bound together by shared values, even if we sometimes clash over strategies. The best path forward is likely a mixture of both: the prudence of age and the boldness of youth.
Gen Z is already beginning to take up the conservative mantle. With the right support and guidance, they can carry it with conviction and clarity. But the work must begin now by listening to one another, learning from one another, and committing to the common purpose that unites us all.
Because in the end, conservatism isn’t about preserving the past for its own sake. It’s about learning from it to build a future worth inheriting.
Hunter Oswald is a Research Fellow for The American Spectator. He is an alum of Grove City College, where he graduated Cum Laude with a B.A. in Political Science. You can follow him on X @HunterOswald8.
Read full article here