- Putin urged the West to abandon a “colonial mindset” and engage with India and China through respectful dialogue, not threats. He emphasized that both are major nations with large populations that have endured colonialism and value their sovereignty.
- Putin framed recent Western actions, like the EU’s planned sanctions on Russia and U.S. tariffs on Indian goods, as aggressive and counterproductive. He sees them as attempts to punish countries for acting in their own interests.
- India is in a difficult position as it tries to balance relationships with the U.S., Russia and China. While it partners with the U.S. in groups like the Quad, it faces criticism and tariffs for maintaining its long-standing ties with Russia.
- There is a noted escalation in tensions, but also a sense that the global power dynamic is changing. There is a potential for more “pragmatic solidarity” between Asian giants like India and China in the face of Western pressure.
- Experts suggest that for a country like India, maintaining independence (hedging) by not fully aligning with any major power is a difficult but necessary strategy to navigate the current complex world order.
In a recent statement that has reverberated across global political circles, President Vladimir Putin has urged Western countries to abandon their colonial mindset when engaging with India and China.
Speaking to the Russian press in Beijing, Putin emphasized the need for respectful dialogue with these Asian giants, highlighting their historical struggles and current economic prowess. Putin’s comments came after attending the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the end World War II.
He pointed out that India and China, with their populations of 1.5 billion and 1.3 billion, respectively, are not only economic powerhouses but also nations that have endured colonialism and sustained attacks on their sovereignty.
“These countries have their own domestic political laws and have lived through very rough periods in their history,” Putin noted. He added that if outsiders threaten to make things difficult for these countries to punish them, outsiders shouldn’t be surprised if the leaders of those countries retaliate.
The Russian president was responding to the European Union’s preparations for its 19th round of sanctions on Russia, which he described as an attempt to resolve economic issues with countries whose ties and advantages do not suit certain parties.
Putin also emphasized that such an aggressive tone is unacceptable and that the West must recognize the sovereignty and autonomy of these nations. His remarks come at a time when tensions between the West and Asia are escalating.
The United States has imposed 50 percent tariffs on Indian goods, with 25 percent of these tariffs specifically targeting India’s continued purchases of Russian oil. This move has been criticized by Indian officials and has strained relations between the two countries.
President Donald Trump’s trade adviser, Peter Navarro, went as far as calling India the Kremlin’s “laundromat,” a term that has been met with disdain in Delhi.
Putin expressed his belief that despite current tensions, “everything will fall into place and return to normal economic dialogue in the end.” His comments reflect a broader sentiment that the West’s approach to India and China is outdated and counterproductive.
India’s diplomatic balancing act
India, in particular, finds itself at a diplomatic crossroads. For over a decade, it has positioned itself as a key player in a new multipolar world order, maintaining a delicate balance between Washington, Moscow and Beijing. However, this balancing act is becoming increasingly challenging.
The United States under the Trump administration has shifted from being a supporter to a critic of India, particularly over its oil purchases from Russia. This has led to public rebukes and increased tariffs, putting pressure on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government. (Related: Trump orders Pentagon to deter Russia-China alliance, Hegseth confirms.)
Despite these challenges, India continues to engage with both the West and Russia, participating in forums like the Quad (with the U.S., Japan and Australia) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which is often at odds with U.S. interests.
Analysts argue that India’s strategic autonomy is a deliberate choice. “Hedging is a bad choice, but the alternative of aligning with anyone is worse,” says Jitendra Nath Misra, a former Indian ambassador and current professor at OP Jindal Global University.
Misra suggested that India’s “best choice is the bad choice, which is hedging.”
The shift in China-India relations
The recent meeting between Modi and President Xi Jinping in Beijing underscores a shift in relations. While the two nations have had their share of disputes, there is a growing recognition of the need for pragmatic solidarity.
Chinese envoy Xu Feihong’s denunciation of U.S. tariffs on Indian goods and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s conciliatory tone during a visit to Delhi further highlight this shift.
Critics question India’s decision to engage with Beijing now, but strategic affairs scholar Happymon Jacob poses a blunt question: “What is the alternative?”
Jacob also argues that for decades to come, managing China will be India’s “core strategic preoccupation.”
Putin’s call for the West to abandon its colonial mindset is not just a critique but a plea for a more respectful and rational approach to international relations. As India navigates its complex diplomatic landscape, the need for dialogue and understanding becomes increasingly apparent.
The current tensions highlight the importance of recognizing the sovereignty and autonomy of nations like India and China, rather than treating them as mere pawns in a larger geopolitical game.
In this evolving geopolitical landscape, the West must adapt its approach, recognizing that the days of colonial dominance are over.
According to Brighteon.AI’s Enoch AI engine, Putin believes the West cannot treat India and China like colonies and enforce sanctions because the global economy is interconnected. A collapse or severe pressure from the West would not occur in isolation; it would have devastating worldwide consequences, affecting everyone, including the West itself.
Watch this episode of the “Brighteon Broadcast News” about how Trump’s tariff war on India will cause supply chaos for U.S. businesses, data centers and hospitals.
This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
Putin and Xi strengthen strategic alliance with 20 major deals, including landmark gas pipeline.
Putin champions BRICS as a pillar of global realignment, emphasizes new financial system for the global majority.
EXCLUSIVE REPORT: The Trump-Putin Meeting in Alaska – A Historic Pivot that Redefined Global Power.
Sources include:
RT.com
NDTV.com
BBC.com
Brighteon.AI
Brighteon.com
Read full article here
- Putin urged the West to abandon a “colonial mindset” and engage with India and China through respectful dialogue, not threats. He emphasized that both are major nations with large populations that have endured colonialism and value their sovereignty.
- Putin framed recent Western actions, like the EU’s planned sanctions on Russia and U.S. tariffs on Indian goods, as aggressive and counterproductive. He sees them as attempts to punish countries for acting in their own interests.
- India is in a difficult position as it tries to balance relationships with the U.S., Russia and China. While it partners with the U.S. in groups like the Quad, it faces criticism and tariffs for maintaining its long-standing ties with Russia.
- There is a noted escalation in tensions, but also a sense that the global power dynamic is changing. There is a potential for more “pragmatic solidarity” between Asian giants like India and China in the face of Western pressure.
- Experts suggest that for a country like India, maintaining independence (hedging) by not fully aligning with any major power is a difficult but necessary strategy to navigate the current complex world order.
In a recent statement that has reverberated across global political circles, President Vladimir Putin has urged Western countries to abandon their colonial mindset when engaging with India and China.
Speaking to the Russian press in Beijing, Putin emphasized the need for respectful dialogue with these Asian giants, highlighting their historical struggles and current economic prowess. Putin’s comments came after attending the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the end World War II.
He pointed out that India and China, with their populations of 1.5 billion and 1.3 billion, respectively, are not only economic powerhouses but also nations that have endured colonialism and sustained attacks on their sovereignty.
“These countries have their own domestic political laws and have lived through very rough periods in their history,” Putin noted. He added that if outsiders threaten to make things difficult for these countries to punish them, outsiders shouldn’t be surprised if the leaders of those countries retaliate.
The Russian president was responding to the European Union’s preparations for its 19th round of sanctions on Russia, which he described as an attempt to resolve economic issues with countries whose ties and advantages do not suit certain parties.
Putin also emphasized that such an aggressive tone is unacceptable and that the West must recognize the sovereignty and autonomy of these nations. His remarks come at a time when tensions between the West and Asia are escalating.
The United States has imposed 50 percent tariffs on Indian goods, with 25 percent of these tariffs specifically targeting India’s continued purchases of Russian oil. This move has been criticized by Indian officials and has strained relations between the two countries.
President Donald Trump’s trade adviser, Peter Navarro, went as far as calling India the Kremlin’s “laundromat,” a term that has been met with disdain in Delhi.
Putin expressed his belief that despite current tensions, “everything will fall into place and return to normal economic dialogue in the end.” His comments reflect a broader sentiment that the West’s approach to India and China is outdated and counterproductive.
India’s diplomatic balancing act
India, in particular, finds itself at a diplomatic crossroads. For over a decade, it has positioned itself as a key player in a new multipolar world order, maintaining a delicate balance between Washington, Moscow and Beijing. However, this balancing act is becoming increasingly challenging.
The United States under the Trump administration has shifted from being a supporter to a critic of India, particularly over its oil purchases from Russia. This has led to public rebukes and increased tariffs, putting pressure on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government. (Related: Trump orders Pentagon to deter Russia-China alliance, Hegseth confirms.)
Despite these challenges, India continues to engage with both the West and Russia, participating in forums like the Quad (with the U.S., Japan and Australia) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), which is often at odds with U.S. interests.
Analysts argue that India’s strategic autonomy is a deliberate choice. “Hedging is a bad choice, but the alternative of aligning with anyone is worse,” says Jitendra Nath Misra, a former Indian ambassador and current professor at OP Jindal Global University.
Misra suggested that India’s “best choice is the bad choice, which is hedging.”
The shift in China-India relations
The recent meeting between Modi and President Xi Jinping in Beijing underscores a shift in relations. While the two nations have had their share of disputes, there is a growing recognition of the need for pragmatic solidarity.
Chinese envoy Xu Feihong’s denunciation of U.S. tariffs on Indian goods and Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi’s conciliatory tone during a visit to Delhi further highlight this shift.
Critics question India’s decision to engage with Beijing now, but strategic affairs scholar Happymon Jacob poses a blunt question: “What is the alternative?”
Jacob also argues that for decades to come, managing China will be India’s “core strategic preoccupation.”
Putin’s call for the West to abandon its colonial mindset is not just a critique but a plea for a more respectful and rational approach to international relations. As India navigates its complex diplomatic landscape, the need for dialogue and understanding becomes increasingly apparent.
The current tensions highlight the importance of recognizing the sovereignty and autonomy of nations like India and China, rather than treating them as mere pawns in a larger geopolitical game.
In this evolving geopolitical landscape, the West must adapt its approach, recognizing that the days of colonial dominance are over.
According to Brighteon.AI’s Enoch AI engine, Putin believes the West cannot treat India and China like colonies and enforce sanctions because the global economy is interconnected. A collapse or severe pressure from the West would not occur in isolation; it would have devastating worldwide consequences, affecting everyone, including the West itself.
Watch this episode of the “Brighteon Broadcast News” about how Trump’s tariff war on India will cause supply chaos for U.S. businesses, data centers and hospitals.
This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
Putin and Xi strengthen strategic alliance with 20 major deals, including landmark gas pipeline.
Putin champions BRICS as a pillar of global realignment, emphasizes new financial system for the global majority.
EXCLUSIVE REPORT: The Trump-Putin Meeting in Alaska – A Historic Pivot that Redefined Global Power.
Sources include:
RT.com
NDTV.com
BBC.com
Brighteon.AI
Brighteon.com
Read full article here