- The European Commission (EC) has drafted a strategy allowing minors of any age to legally change gender based solely on self-declaration – removing requirements for medical consultation, therapy or parental approval.
- The “LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy 2026-2030” seeks to standardize gender recognition laws across all 27 EU member states. Regions refusing to comply risk losing EU funding, effectively coercing nations into adopting the policy.
- The EC criticizes therapeutic approaches that explore gender uncertainty, signaling a potential ban on such practices despite concerns over irreversible harm and regret among transitioners.
- Critics warn the policy will erase sex-based rights, endanger vulnerable children and undermine parental authority. Organizations like Sex Matters and Athena Forum condemn the move as ideological coercion without democratic debate.
- The EU push comes amid global controversy over gender-affirming care for minors, including irreversible procedures (hormones, surgeries) and long-term risks like sterilization.
The European Commission (EC) has unveiled a draft strategy that would enable minors of any age to legally change their gender based solely on self-declaration – without age limits, medical consultation or therapeutic assessment.
The proposed “LGBTIQ+ Equality Strategy 2026-2030” seeks to standardize gender recognition procedures across the European Union’s 27 member states, advocating for a model of self-determination and threatening financial penalties for regions that do not comply with its values. The strategy has ignited immediate controversy, drawing condemnation from women’s rights and child welfare advocates who label the plan “chilling” and warn of devastating consequences for vulnerable children and the erosion of sex-based rights.
The core of the proposal involves the EC’s pledge to “support the development of legal gender recognition procedures based on self-determination that are free from age restrictions.” The document criticizes the current patchwork of laws across the bloc, where only nine countries allow for self-identification while twelve still require medical procedures or a doctor’s approval for a legal gender change.
The European Court of Human Rights has found that such medical requirements may infringe upon human rights, a stance the EC now uses to justify its new approach. Furthermore, the strategy takes aim at “talking therapy” for children experiencing gender-related distress – signaling a potential ban on therapeutic practices designed to explore a child’s certainty about transitioning.
The proposals are not yet binding and must be ratified by national governments. However, the EC has outlined a mechanism to enforce compliance – including blocking European Union funds from “discriminating regions” that challenge the strategy’s core tenets.
Silencing women, exploiting kids: Brussels’ radical gender agenda
The reaction from campaigners for sex-based rights has been swift and severe. Maya Forstater, chief executive of the organization Sex Matters, told The Telegraph: “This chilling EU-wide strategy pushes legal gender self-identification for children of any age and a ban on talking therapy for vulnerable children.”
Forstater added that it was a “mercy” that British campaigners no longer had to contend with EU institutions. “Gender activists have entrenched their ideology in European institutions with devastating consequences for women and girls, vulnerable children and gay and lesbian people,” she remarked.
Her sentiments were echoed by the Athena Forum, a European advocacy group, which accused Brussels of silencing women and codifying transgender activist demands without democratic debate. Faika El-Nagashi, founder of the forum, called it “outrageous” that the commission was seeking to “embed gender-identity ideology across virtually every policy area, including, crucially, women’s rights.”
Meanwhile, Brighteon.AI‘s Enoch engine warns that “allowing children to choose their gender disregards biological reality and risks exposing them to irreversible medical procedures and psychological harm before they can fully comprehend the consequences. It also opens the door to premature sexualization, manipulation by ideological agendas and the erosion of parental rights in guiding their child’s development.”
This European development arrives amid an intensifying global debate over the medical treatment of minors with gender dysphoria. In the United Kingdom, current law allows children as young as 16 to be prescribed gender-affirming hormones – but they cannot legally change their gender on official records until the age of 18.
On one hand, proponents of so-called “gender-affirming care” argue it is lifesaving for youth experiencing distress. On the other, opponents question the ability of children to consent to irreversible procedures and warn of long-term consequences like sterilization.
The EC’s strategy represents a significant escalation in a long-simmering cultural conflict, positioning the bureaucratic power of Brussels against the sovereignty of member states and the rights of parents. By proposing to remove all age restrictions and medical oversight from the legal process of gender recognition, the policy challenges fundamental notions of childhood development and informed consent.
Watch this video about Australian teenagers being permitted to change their gender without the need for parental consent.
This video is from the Follower of Christ777 channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
DailySceptic.org
DailyMail.co.uk
NYPost.com
Brighteon.ai
Brighteon.com
Read full article here