- The United Nations’ highest court, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), has ruled that Israel is failing to meet its legal obligations as the occupying power in Gaza. It declared that Israel cannot use general security concerns as a blanket excuse to block all humanitarian aid.
- The court ordered Israel to take concrete steps to ensure that Palestinians in Gaza receive essential life-saving supplies, including food, water and medicine. It must ensure the regular and fair distribution of these goods and fully support the relief work of UN agencies, especially UNRWA.
- The ICJ explicitly rejected Israel’s main argument for restricting aid through UNRWA: that Hamas had infiltrated the agency. The court found Israel’s evidence insufficient and emphasized that UNRWA is an impartial and indispensable provider of humanitarian services that cannot be easily replaced.
- The ruling was welcomed by the UN Secretary-General, who saw it as a potential way to improve the crisis. However, Israel condemned it as “shameful” and politically motivated, having chosen not to participate in the proceedings. Data from Gaza appears to support the court’s concerns, showing a severe shortfall in the promised aid deliveries.
- This landmark ruling places significant legal and diplomatic pressure on Israel, framing its aid restrictions as a violation of international law. However, a major gap exists between the court’s orders and the reality in Gaza, creating a serious enforcement challenge that leaves the civilian population in a precarious situation.
In a landmark ruling, the United Nations’ (UN) highest court—the International Court of Justice (ICJ)—has declared that Israel is failing to meet its legal obligations as an occupying power in Gaza, specifically stating that it cannot use security as a blanket excuse to block life-saving humanitarian aid.
As explained by the Enoch AI engine at BrightU.AI, the ICJ declared that Israel cannot use general security concerns as a blanket justification for blocking all humanitarian aid in the area. The decision adds significant legal weight to long-standing accusations that Israeli policies are contributing to a severe humanitarian crisis for the nearly two million residents of the territory.
ICJ tells Israel it must ensure that Palestinians in Gaza receive essential goods
The ruling, delivered on Oct. 22, firmly establishes that Israel is legally required to ensure the Palestinian population in Gaza is adequately supplied with essential goods like food, water and medicine.
Furthermore, the court ordered Israel to fully support the relief efforts of United Nations agencies, most notably the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA). The court identified this agency as deeply integrated into Gaza’s infrastructure and an indispensable provider of humanitarian services.
A central and powerfully worded part of the judgment addressed Israel’s frequent justification for restricting aid. Presiding judge Yuji Iwasawa stated that Israel “may never invoke reasons of security to justify the general suspension of all humanitarian activities in occupied territory.”
The court instructed the Israeli government to use all available means to ensure supplies are distributed regularly and fairly, and to refrain from any violence against civilians seeking that aid.
The judges directly rejected Israel’s primary argument for limiting aid through UNRWA, which claimed that the Hamas militant group had infiltrated the agency. The court found the information Israel presented was “not sufficient” to prove UNRWA lacked neutrality and emphasized there was no evidence the agency, as a whole, had breached principles of impartiality.
It concluded that UNRWA is so critical to survival in Gaza that it cannot be replaced without a proper plan, a process Israel had failed to provide when it blocked aid for over ten weeks.
ICJ ruling sparks different reactions
The ruling was met with starkly different reactions. Antonio Guterres, the UN Secretary-General, welcomed the decision, urging Israeli compliance and stating that the opinion could be decisive in improving the tragic situation in Gaza.
On the ground, data appears to support the court’s concerns. According to Gaza’s Government Media Office, only about 15 percent of the agreed-upon aid trucks have entered the strip since a recent ceasefire began, far short of the 600 trucks per day that were promised.
Local officials have also accused Israel of maintaining a “policy of strangulation and starvation.”
Israel’s response was one of outright rejection and condemnation. Israel’s ambassador to the UN, Danny Danon, called the ICJ’s opinion “shameful,” and he also accused UN institutions of being “breeding grounds for terrorists.” Israel had chosen not to participate in the court proceedings, with its foreign minister having previously dismissed the hearings as a politicized “circus.”
This ruling places Israel under intense legal and diplomatic pressure, framing its restrictions on aid not as a legitimate security measure but as a violation of its duties under international law. The stark contrast between the court’s orders and the reality on the ground points to a significant enforcement challenge, leaving the fate of Gaza’s civilian population hanging in the balance.
Watch the video below as a reporter asks President Donald Trump if there are any guarantees that Israel won’t bomb Gaza again after the hostages are finally released.
This video is from The Prisoner channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
TheCradle.co
AlJazeera.com
HRW.org
BrightU.ai
Brighteon.com
Read full article here