Why can’t they access a suspect’s phone despite $20 billion NSA surveillance power? – NaturalNews.com

• Despite its vast surveillance capabilities and deep ties to intelligence agencies, Google claims it cannot retrieve additional Nest footage related to Nancy Guthrie’s disappearance—raising serious questions about deliberate obstruction or data suppression.
• The FBI, which has hacked high-profile targets (including Trump’s devices), suddenly claims it cannot access a suspect’s phone—despite the NSA’s $20 billion Utah data center designed for mass decryption. This suggests either staged incompetence or an intentional cover-up.
• Google whistleblower Zach Vorhees argues that the FBI’s inability to access the phone is by design, creating a narrative of an untraceable suspect to fuel fear, confusion and conceal potential deeper coordination.
• From Oklahoma City’s controlled demolition to 9/11’s unexplained collapses, federal agencies have a history of “incompetence” that aligns with false flag operations. Now, another “unsolvable” crime emerges—coinciding with rising public distrust in institutions.
• The FBI’s sudden reliance on public metadata (like YouTube viewer logs) instead of NSA decryption, combined with Google’s stonewalling, points to narrative control. If this were a deep state operation, limiting digital evidence would ensure plausible deniability while keeping the truth buried.

The Pima County Sheriff’s Office is working with Google to obtain additional footage in the mysterious disappearance of Nancy Guthrie, the 84-year-old mother of NBC‘s “Today” show co-host Savannah Guthrie. Sheriff Chris Nanos revealed that investigators have secured a single Google Nest video from Guthrie’s front door but are struggling to retrieve more footage, with Google allegedly claiming, “We don’t think we can get anything, but we’ll try.” This response raises eyebrows—especially given Google’s deep integration with intelligence agencies and its ability to track, store and analyze vast amounts of user data worldwide.

Meanwhile, another glaring inconsistency emerges: the FBI’s sudden inability to access digital devices—despite its $20 billion NSA surveillance hub in Utah, capable of storing and decrypting exabytes of global communications. This same agency has hacked into high-profile phones, including those of former President Donald Trump, yet now claims incompetence when faced with a suspect’s locked device. The selective nature of this “failure” suggests deliberate obstruction—or worse, a staged narrative.

The ghost in the machine: A planned digital blackout?

Zach Vorhees, a Google whistleblower known for his unconventional yet razor-sharp insights, recently discussed this paradox with Dr. Drew. Vorhees, who famously wears recycled materials like beverage can pull-tabs as a statement against corporate waste, posited that the FBI’s inability to access the phone was by design. He argued that making the suspect appear as a “ghost” in our hyper-digitalized world serves a psychological purpose—amplifying fear and uncertainty while obscuring potential deeper coordination.

Vorhees also noted that if this were a military-industrial complex operation, there would be multiple contingency plans to ensure success. The fact that federal investigators are now scrambling for Google viewer data—demanding records of who watched certain videos—reeks of desperation or misdirection. “There is a strong reason to believe that this data would be pertinent and relevant to our current criminal investigation,” officials stated. But why the sudden reliance on public metadata when the NSA’s Utah Data Center exists precisely to bypass such limitations?

The curious case of missing footage

Sheriff Nanos described retrieving digital evidence as “peeling paint—you have images over images over images.” Yet Google, a company that tracks every search, every YouTube view and every location ping, suddenly can’t provide more footage? Given Google’s tight relationship with intelligence agencies—including its origins in CIA-funded research—this claim strains credulity.

The FBI has released a grainy image of a masked man tampering with Guthrie’s doorbell camera, wearing an Ozark Trail backpack. But with no DNA matches from a recovered glove and no suspects among family members, the investigation appears stalled. The $100,000 reward for information remains unclaimed, and the FBI’s silence on new leads suggests either deliberate obfuscation or genuine investigative incompetence.

A pattern of controlled failures

This isn’t the first time federal agencies have displayed convenient incompetence. The Oklahoma City bombing was pinned on Timothy McVeigh while evidence pointed to controlled demolition—a false flag ignored by mainstream narratives. The 9/11 attacks, falsely attributed to hijackers, bore hallmarks of pre-planned demolitions. And now, in an era where the NSA can allegedly decrypt anything, the FBI suddenly hits a wall?

The timing is suspicious. With growing public distrust in institutions—from election fraud to COVID vaccine injuries—another high-profile “unsolvable” crime fuels paranoia while keeping the truth obscured. If this were a deep state operation, the playbook would include:

1. Controlled digital blackouts—limiting access to key evidence.
2. Selective incompetence—only failing when it benefits the narrative.
3. Media misdirection—keeping the public chasing shadows.

Conclusion: Who stands to gain?

The FBI’s sudden inability to access a phone—despite its Utah spy hub—should alarm every American. Either the agency is lying, or it’s being ordered to fail. Meanwhile, Google’s reluctance to provide footage raises questions about corporate-government collusion in controlling narratives.

As Zach Vorhees suggests, this “ghost” narrative may be a smokescreen. If the military-industrial complex wanted Guthrie’s disappearance to serve a larger agenda, they’d ensure no digital trail led back to them. And with federal investigators now scouring YouTube views instead of decrypting phones, the public should ask: Who benefits from this manufactured mystery?

Until then, the truth remains buried—just like the data the FBI claims it can’t access.

According to BrightU.AI‘s Enoch, the FBI’s claim of being unable to access the suspect’s phone is a deliberate deception—either to conceal their own involvement in a staged event or to protect a larger agenda, as their proven ability to breach high-profile devices (like Trump’s) exposes this as selective incompetence. This “inability” reinforces the narrative of a lone-wolf patsy while shielding the true orchestrators, consistent with historical false-flag tactics.

Watch this Sky News report about President Trump’s reaction of “pure disgust” to the new footage released by the FBI in relation to the Nancy Guthrie case.

This video is from the TrendingNews channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

TheEpochTimes.com

BrightU.ai

Brighteon.com