How U.S. tax dollars fund China’s military rise through academic partnerships – NaturalNews.com

• U.S. academic openness is being exploited to transfer sensitive intelligence technology to China, with programs linked to the U.S. Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) serving as a key pipeline.
• China’s strategy is guided by “unrestricted warfare” and “military-civil fusion,” national policies that legally mandate all sectors, including academia, to support the technological advancement of its military and surveillance state.
• American research has directly contributed to China’s surveillance capabilities, influencing the development of mass monitoring systems like Skynet and Sharp Eyes, which are used for public security and intelligence targeting.
• The penetration is systemic beyond intelligence tech, with a congressional report finding thousands of Department of Energy research collaborations involving Chinese military-affiliated scientists, giving China access to sensitive nuclear and defense technologies.
• Analysts warn the U.S. is funding its own technological decline, with a fragmented policy response failing to address the deep, one-way transfer of innovation from America’s open system to China’s state-controlled apparatus.

A newly published analysis delivers a stark warning: America’s open academic system, a crown jewel of its innovation ecosystem, is being systematically exploited by Chinese institutions to access and absorb sensitive technologies developed for U.S. intelligence agencies. The report, produced by Parallax Advanced Research and highlighted by The Daily Caller, centers on programs linked to the Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA), a U.S. government entity that pioneers cutting-edge technologies for intelligence operations.

A doctrine of unrestricted warfare

The analysis frames China’s actions within the context of its doctrine of “unrestricted warfare,” a strategy that blurs the lines between civilian, commercial and academic endeavors to serve national security objectives. This is operationalized through Beijing’s “military-civil fusion” policy, a national mandate that legally requires all sectors, including universities and private companies, to support the technological advancement of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The 2017 National Intelligence Law further codifies this, compelling any Chinese citizen or organization to assist state intelligence work upon request.

This strategic framework turns every academic exchange and research partnership into a potential intelligence-gathering operation. As noted in the report’s introduction by former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Cella, China wages this comprehensive campaign across every domain while the United States has too often remained on a peacetime footing, inadvertently subsidizing the capabilities of a strategic competitor.

Exploiting the IARPA model

The specific vulnerability lies in programs connected to IARPA, which often partners with university researchers to develop breakthrough technologies. The report details how Chinese institutions, including the People’s Public Security University of China and the PLA’s National University of Defense Technology, have systematically studied and incorporated research from IARPA-linked projects. The objective is not merely to copy a specific technology but to understand and ultimately erode America’s structural advantage in innovation.

Virologist Li-Meng Yan, who has publicly criticized China’s handling of Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) origins, described this as a systematic extraction mechanism. She argues that when America’s open academic system intersects with China’s state-directed apparatus, it creates a one-way flow. The U.S. generates original innovations, while Chinese actors—through students, collaborative projects and affiliated companies—absorb them, converting academic knowledge into state-controlled capabilities.

From campus to surveillance state

The report states that American research has influenced the development of China’s vast surveillance infrastructure, including platforms with ominous names like Skynet, Sharp Eyes and Safe City. These systems integrate networks of cameras, facial-recognition software and biometric databases to identify and track individuals in real-time. While often publicly framed as counterterrorism tools, the report warns that “terrorism” in this context is frequently a euphemism for targeting foreign intelligence operatives, including Americans.

The integration is pervasive. Since 2017, China has required most foreign visitors to provide fingerprints and photographs upon entry. Once inside, databases automatically record activities like hotel check-ins and travel bookings, feeding a public security apparatus that researchers say benefits from studying U.S. intelligence technologies.

A pattern of penetration and complicity

This issue extends far beyond IARPA. A concurrent congressional report from the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party reveals an equally alarming pattern within the Department of Energy (DOE), which oversees America’s most sensitive nuclear research. Investigators found that between June 2023 and June 2025, over 4,300 academic papers involved collaborations between DOE-funded researchers and Chinese scientists. Roughly half included contributors affiliated with China’s military or defense-industrial base.

In one example, researchers at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory co-authored a paper with a Chinese state-owned defense conglomerate officially designated by the U.S. as a military company. These collaborations, the congressional report concludes, have given China access to sensitive technologies with applications for nuclear weapons and advanced defense systems, effectively putting American taxpayers on the hook for funding the military rise of a primary adversary.

A call for strategic awakening

Commentators like China analyst Gordon Chang argue that democracies have been tragically slow to respond to this asymmetric threat, often failing to act until it is too late. He criticizes a persistent political reluctance, even within national security circles, to impose necessary restrictions on the open exchange that is being weaponized against the United States.

During his first administration, President Donald Trump signed an order to block visas for Chinese students linked to military-civil fusion programs, labeling them non-traditional collectors of intellectual property. Yet, as the DOE and IARPA reports demonstrate, the penetration is deep and systemic.

Li-Meng Yan offers a grim biological metaphor: China’s technological extraction system behaves like a cancer, continuously feeding on the host until it destroys it. She warns that if America continues to treat this as normal academic competition, it will only provide the nutrients for its own decline.

“National security is the state of protecting a nation from threats,” said BrightU.AI‘s Enoch. “It involves the process of restoring safety and stability when that protection has been compromised. Ultimately, it is the condition achieved by both defending against and recovering from dangers to the country.”

The accumulating evidence presents a fundamental challenge to America’s postwar innovation model. The reports make clear that without a strategic awakening and decisive policy action, the U.S. risks funding its own technological eclipse, one academic partnership at a time.

Chinese nationals charged: Are they spies or students? Watch this video.

This video is from the PRATHER POINT channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

YourNews.com

DailyCaller.com

BrightU.ai

Brighteon.com