A once-classified federal strategy paper has been declassified, revealing the Biden administration’s extensive plans to address “domestic terrorism.” The document, released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard following legal pressure from America First Legal (AFL), outlines a sweeping strategy that extends far beyond traditional national security measures. Remember when the “unvaccinated” were a domestic terror threat? Remember when parents who spoke up at school board meetings were classified as a domestic terror threat? These are just two examples of the Biden regime weaponizing the federal government against  individual Americans.

America First Legal (AFL) sounded the alarm in an April 2 letter, accusing the Biden regime of of weaponizing federal power against its own citizens. The group warned that officials were labeling “disfavored views” as “misinformation,” “disinformation,” or “hate speech” and moving to suppress them under the guise of national security. Tulsi Gabbard responded on April 5, acknowledging the concerns and promising action to restore transparency and accountability.

The mechanics of control

The plan promotes aggressive collaboration with private-sector partners, particularly tech companies. These firms are encouraged to work closely with federal agencies, sharing data and identifying online threats. On paper, this appears as public-private cooperation, but in practice, it looks like the institutionalization of speech surveillance. The strategy calls for sweeping educational initiatives, with federal agencies leading digital and civic literacy campaigns aimed at training Americans to spot “disinformation” and consume government-approved content.

The core issue lies in the looseness of the definitions. “Misinformation” is a fluid category, shifting with political context and official narratives. When the government starts guiding information flow based on ideological judgments, the line between counterterrorism and censorship blurs. The plan does not explicitly call for censorship, but it outlines a framework where suppression can operate quietly and systematically. Social platforms adjust algorithms, flag certain content, or apply filters, all while citing guidance from federal agencies. The result is a system of influence without direct orders, and coercion without fingerprints.

International dimensions and global control

One particularly controversial component of the strategy involves tying the United States into international speech governance schemes, such as the Christchurch Call. Born from the horror of a mass shooting in New Zealand, the initiative originally focused on tackling online extremism. However, it has since morphed into a global bureaucratic vehicle for content control. The previous Trump administration gave it a pass, citing the First Amendment, but the Biden administration embraced it, assigning the National Security Council and the State Department to actively participate.

The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism (GIFCT) is another key player in this strategy. This cross-border partnership of Big Tech and government outfits operates a shared hash database used to flag and delete content before human eyes ever see it. The database is fast, opaque, and thoroughly insulated from public oversight. Researchers and independent journalists have tried to access this database but were denied. Yet, the database has reportedly swept up not just terrorist propaganda but also satire, news reports, and dissenting opinions that diverge from mainstream policy positions.

Executive summary report on declassified Biden-Era domestic terror strategy

A once-classified federal strategy paper, released by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard following legal pressure from America First Legal (AFL), has shed light on the Biden administration’s comprehensive approach to countering domestic terrorism. The 15-page document, dated June 2021, outlines a series of objectives aimed at curbing domestic extremism. However, it’s clear that the Biden regime’s strategy involves broad definitions and expansive surveillance mechanisms that posed significant risks to civil liberties and free speech.

Key points:

Broad surveillance: The Biden administration’s strategy extends beyond traditional national security to include extensive monitoring of online speech and ideology.

Tech partnerships: The plan emphasizes collaboration with tech companies to identify and flag online threats. Most of the flagged “threats” were ordinary people with political views and opinions that were different than the regime.

Global speech regulation: The strategy involves participation in international frameworks like the Christchurch Call to regulate online content.

Educational initiatives: Federal agencies are tasked with promoting digital literacy and civic education to counter “disinformation.”

Financial tracking: The plan includes enhanced financial intelligence sharing to trace funding and activity patterns.

Legal and policy reforms: The strategy calls for assessing and potentially reforming laws and policies to address domestic terrorism.

Pillar One: Understand and share domestic terrorism-related information

The first pillar focuses on enhancing the federal government’s understanding and sharing of domestic terrorism-related information. Key actions include:

Enhanced research and analysis: The FBI, DHS, and NCTC are tasked with producing regular analytic products on domestic terrorism, including transnational aspects, and disseminating them widely.

Improved information sharing: The DOJ and FBI are to develop more robust public reporting on federal domestic terrorism-related prosecutions and provide resources to state, local, tribal, and territorial law enforcement.

Transnational aspects: The State Department, FBI, DOJ, and CIA are to enhance information sharing with international partners and explore potential foreign connections to domestic terrorism.

Pillar Two: Prevent domestic terrorism recruitment and mobilization to violence

This pillar aims to strengthen prevention resources and services and address online recruitment and mobilization. Notable actions include:

One-stop website: DHS is to create a user-friendly website to improve access to federal services, research, grants, and training related to domestic terrorism and violence prevention.

Digital literacy programming: DHS, in collaboration with other agencies, is to channel funding towards research on the effectiveness of digital literacy programs and facilitate their development through grants and technical assistance.

Prevention programming: DHS and DOJ are to continue developing and expanding local threat assessment and management teams, with a focus on public health and individual-level health and safety.

Pillar Three: Disrupt and deter domestic terrorism activity

The third pillar focuses on enabling appropriate investigation and prosecution of domestic terrorism crimes. Key actions include:

Resource allocation: The DOJ and FBI are to ensure sufficient funding and personnel resources to counter the evolving domestic terrorism threat.

Information sharing: DHS and NCTC are to improve the accessibility of existing law enforcement information sharing platforms and develop new mechanisms for efficient and timely information sharing.

Legislative reforms: The DOJ is to examine the necessity and appropriateness of new legislative authorities to counter domestic terrorism, while protecting civil rights and civil liberties.

Pillar Four: Confront long-term contributors to domestic terrorism

The final pillar aims to address the root causes of domestic terrorism. Actions include:

Lethal means safety: The Domestic Policy Council (DPC) is to rein in the proliferation of “ghost guns,” encourage state adoption of extreme risk protection orders, and drive other executive and legislative actions, including banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines.

Hate crime prevention: The DPC is to implement the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act to address hate crime reporting barriers and promote law enforcement training and resources.

Public education campaign: The DPC is to launch a national campaign to improve lethal means safety, expand access to mental health crisis lines, and integrate behavioral health care into primary care settings.

Civics education: The DPC is to promote civics education and support research on information literacy to foster resilience to disinformation.

Volunteerism and Civic Engagement: The DPC is to promote volunteerism and increase opportunities for national service through AmeriCorps, as well as advance legislative and executive actions to increase voter participation.

Criticisms and concerns

Critics, including AFL, have raised several concerns:

Broad definitions: The strategy’s broad definitions of “misinformation,” “disinformation,” and “hate speech” could lead to the suppression of legitimate political speech and dissent.

Surveillance and censorship: The plan’s emphasis on surveillance and collaboration with tech companies could result in a system of influence and coercion without direct orders.

International frameworks: Participation in international frameworks like the Christchurch Call could lead to the adoption of more stringent content control measures, similar to those in other countries.

Financial tracking: Enhanced financial intelligence sharing could be used to track and penalize individuals based on their political beliefs or speech.

The declassified Biden administration’s strategy for countering domestic terrorism reveals a multifaceted approach that extends far beyond traditional national security measures. While the plan aims to enhance public safety and prevent acts of violence, its broad definitions and expansive surveillance mechanisms raise significant concerns about the potential erosion of civil liberties and free speech. The strategy must be scrapped, as it will be crucial to ensure that public safety agendas remain consistent with the rule of law and American values. Protecting people’s privacy, respecting their beliefs and protecting their rights should be paramount.

Sources include:

ReclaimtheNet.org

NaturalNews.com

NaturalNews.com

Docs.ReclaimtheNet.org [PDF]