• EPA Chief Michael Regan allocated $7 billion to a climate fund in April 2024, sparking allegations of misuse for political purposes and radical causes, raising questions about the legitimacy of climate initiatives.
• The fund has been accused of supporting political activities like paying ballot stuffers, bribing judges, and financing Democratic campaigns, as well as backing left-wing movements, fueling public outrage.
• The scandal underscores how climate change initiatives can be co-opted for partisan goals, leading to calls for a thorough investigation into the fund’s operations and those involved in its creation.
• Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has referred four sanctuary city mayors to Attorney General Pam Bondi for prosecution, emphasizing the need for accountability in the face of alleged federal offenses.
• The scandal erodes trust in government environmental action, leading to demands for greater transparency and accountability in climate fund management, with potential long-term consequences for climate policies and public trust.

Recent allegations have brought unprecedented scrutiny to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and its chief, Michael Regan, appointed under the Biden administration. The controversy centers on a decision made in April 2024, where Regan allocated $7 billion to a climate fund that has come under fire for its questionable projects and operations. Critics argue that the fund has been used as a slush fund to funnel money to political allies and support radical left-wing causes, raising significant questions about the legitimacy of climate change initiatives and the potential misuse of taxpayer funds.

The Fund’s Questionable Projects

The $7 billion climate fund, launched just five months before the allocation, has been shrouded in controversy from the start. Reports indicate that the fund has supported a range of projects and operations that are more political than environmental. For instance, some of the money has allegedly been used to pay off ballot stuffing mules, bribe judges, finance campaign advertising for Democrats, and even support radical left-wing causes like Black Lives Matter and wokeism. These allegations have sparked widespread outrage, with many questioning the true intent behind the fund’s creation.

Political Implications

The scandal highlights the deep political divisions in the United States and the ways in which climate change initiatives can be co-opted for partisan purposes. Critics argue that the climate fund was a cover story used by Democrats to launder money and support their political agenda. This has led to calls for a thorough investigation into the fund’s operations and the individuals involved in its creation and management.

Calls for Accountability

Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna has taken a strong stance against the misuse of the climate fund. In a recent address, she referred four sanctuary city mayors to Attorney General Pam Bondi for prosecution, accusing them of directly violating U.S. Title 8, Code, Subsection 1324, a federal offense. Luna’s actions highlight the broader trend of holding public officials accountable for their decisions, especially when those decisions impact public trust and financial integrity.

The Impact on Climate Change Initiatives

The scandal surrounding the EPA and the climate fund has broader implications for climate change initiatives. It has raised doubts about the government’s commitment to genuine environmental action and has fueled skepticism about the effectiveness of climate policies. Environmentalists and climate advocates are now urging for more transparent and accountable practices in the allocation and management of climate funds.

The allegations against EPA Chief Michael Regan and the $7 billion climate fund highlight the complex intersection of politics and environmental policy. As the investigation unfolds, the public and lawmakers are likely to demand greater transparency and accountability. The outcome of this scandal could have far-reaching consequences for future climate change initiatives and the public’s trust in government institutions.

Watch this March 06 episode of “Brighteon Broadcast News” as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, discusses the exposure of a climate slush fund, robots for off-grid living, and growing your own food.

This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

The digital control grid is taking shape under the Trump Administration

Biden’s $20 billion green slush fund under FBI probe: A scandal of waste, corruption and political cronyism

“Climate of Extremes” challenges the mainstream narrative on global warming

Sources include:

Brighteon.com

USnews.com