• The European Court of Justice (ECJ) ruled in 2025 that healthcare professionals promoting or administering COVID-19 vaccines are civilly and criminally liable for harm caused, as they had the autonomy to refuse participation.
• In 2020, Dr. Vernon Coleman warned that doctors prescribing experimental COVID-19 vaccines could face lawsuits and imprisonment if harm occurred—a prediction now validated by the ECJ’s decision.
• Potential damages per patient could reach millions, overwhelming insurance and bankrupting many doctors in the U.K., U.S., EU and other regions.
• The ruling raises questions about the role of media, tech platforms (e.g., YouTube, BBC) and pharmaceutical companies in censorship and misinformation, with figures like Dr. Mike Yeadon alleging intentional harm from vaccines.
• The decision signals a need for transparency and accountability in medicine, potentially reshaping healthcare systems and diminishing trust in rushed medical interventions.

In a groundbreaking decision that could reshape the medical landscape, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled that healthcare professionals who promoted or administered COVID-19 vaccines are civilly and criminally liable for any harm caused. This ruling, announced in early 2025, underscores the profound implications of medical professionals who participated in the mass vaccination campaign, a move that has long been a source of controversy and debate within the medical community.

A prophetic warning

Back in 2020, Dr. Vernon Coleman, a noted medical writer and health freedom advocate, issued a stark warning. He foretold that doctors who prescribed the then-experimental COVID-19 vaccines would face severe legal consequences, including lawsuits and potential imprisonment. Dr. Coleman’s warning was grounded in his belief that the vaccines could cause significant harm, a stance that was met with skepticism and criticism from mainstream medical institutions.

“Back in 2020, I warned that doctors who prescribed the then-new and experimental covid-19 vaccine would likely be sued (and also imprisoned) if it turned out, as I expected, that the vaccine caused harm to those who were injected,” Dr. Coleman wrote in his new book, The End of Medicine. “I warned that doctors’ insurers would not be able to cope and that thousands of doctors would go bankrupt.”

The European Court of Justice ruling

The ECJ’s recent ruling validates Dr. Coleman’s predictions. The court determined that healthcare professionals had the autonomy to refuse the vaccines and, therefore, bear full responsibility for their actions. This decision has far-reaching consequences, not only for individual doctors but also for the broader healthcare system.

According to the ruling, doctors who urged people to be vaccinated or who administered the vaccines are both civilly and criminally liable. The court emphasized that physicians were not compelled to prescribe or administer the vaccines and thus must take responsibility for their choices. This ruling could exonerate those doctors who opposed the vaccines or criticized them and faced disciplinary actions.

“This ruling could result in those doctors who were subject to disciplinary proceedings because they opposed vaccinations, or because they criticized the vaccines, being exonerated,” Dr. Coleman noted.

The financial implications

The financial ramifications of this ruling are staggering. If patients claim severe and permanent damage from the vaccines, the potential damages could run into millions of pounds, dollars, or euros per patient. Dr. Coleman estimates that the total financial burden could bankrupt the vast majority of doctors in countries such as the U.K., U.S., Canada, Australia and the EU.

“It seems likely that the sum per patient could run into millions of pounds/dollars/euros,” Dr. Coleman stated. “I doubt if doctors’ insurance companies would have enough money to satisfy millions of claims (with each patient demanding millions of pounds) and so the vast majority of doctors in the U.K., the U.S., Canada, Australia, the EU etc., etc., would go bankrupt.”

Accountability and the Media

The ECJ’s ruling also raises questions about the accountability of other entities that played a role in the vaccination campaign. Dr. Mike Yeadon, a former Pfizer executive, has been vocal about his belief that the COVID-19 vaccines were “deliberately designed intentionally to injure, kill and reduce fertility.”

“If I was wrong, I would have expected the drug companies whose products I am maligning to have sought and secured a court injunction to stop me repeating these allegations,” Dr. Yeadon said. “Neither of those things have ever happened. What has happened instead is that I have been extraordinarily censored and smeared sideways. And I think I offer that to you as strong evidence that I may be ‘over the target,’ at least in relation to these injectable products that have definitely injured and killed many people.”

Dr. Yeadon’s testimony adds a layer of complexity to the debate, suggesting that the scientific establishment and media have a role to play in the accountability process. Social media platforms like YouTube and the BBC, for instance, could face legal action for censoring critical voices and suppressing vital information.

The European Court of Justice’s ruling marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing saga of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign. It underscores the need for transparency, accountability and a reevaluation of how medical professionals are held responsible for their actions. As the legal and financial implications unfold, the medical landscape may see profound changes, potentially leading to a future where human doctors are no longer the primary providers of healthcare.

For now, the ruling serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of rush-to-market medical interventions and the importance of careful, evidence-based decision-making in healthcare.

Sources include:

TheExpose.com

DeepNewz.com

NaturalNews.com