House rejects measure to curb Trump’s military authority in Venezuela amid escalating tensions
- The U.S. House narrowly rejected (215-215) a Democratic-led resolution restricting Trump’s ability to deploy military force in Venezuela without congressional approval. The vote highlighted deep partisan divisions over war powers and fears of unauthorized escalation in the Caribbean.
- GOP lawmakers argued no U.S. troops were actively engaged in Venezuela, calling the resolution premature. Democrats countered that Trump’s recent raid in Caracas and naval blockade demanded congressional oversight.
- Venezuela, backed by Russia and China, denies U.S. drug-trafficking claims, calling them a pretext for regime change. Analysts warn of potential false flag operations (similar to Operation Northwoods) to justify U.S. intervention.
- Speaker Mike Johnson’s slim majority relied on last-minute GOP votes, including Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX), who rushed back to cast the deciding vote. Only two Republicans, Reps. Don Bacon (R-NE) and Thomas Massie (R-KY), joined Democrats in supporting the resolution.
- The failed vote continues the trend of Congress ceding authority to the executive branch, raising concerns over unchecked military escalation. Trump’s aggressive foreign policy, including threats against Denmark and NATO allies, fuels fears of further unauthorized conflicts.
The U.S. House of Representatives narrowly rejected a Democratic-led resolution Thursday that sought to restrict President Donald Trump’s ability to deploy military force in Venezuela without congressional approval.
The 215-215 tie vote, which effectively killed the measure, underscored deepening partisan divisions over war powers and fears of unauthorized escalation in the Caribbean – a region now at the center of a Cold War-style standoff between the U.S. and Venezuela’s allies, Russia and China.
The failed resolution, introduced by Rep. Jim McGovern (D-MA), would have required Trump to withdraw U.S. forces from Venezuela unless Congress explicitly authorized military action. The vote came just weeks after Trump ordered a surprise raid in Caracas that resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro – an operation conducted without prior congressional consultation.
Republicans dismissed the resolution as unnecessary, insisting no U.S. troops are currently engaged in Venezuela.
“Democrats are asking us to vote on a situation that literally does not exist,” said Rep. Brian Mast (R-FL). “There are no tanks on the ground in Caracas, there are no snipers in the tree line.”
But Democrats countered that Trump’s recent actions, including the raid and an ongoing naval blockade, demand congressional oversight.
“Donald Trump is reducing the United States to a regional bully with fewer allies and more enemies,” warned Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-NY).
A test of war powers amid rising tensions
The debate over Venezuela has reignited long-standing tensions between Congress and the White House over war-making authority – a conflict dating back to the Vietnam War-era War Powers Act. Trump has repeatedly invoked post-9/11 wartime powers to justify strikes against alleged drug traffickers, though critics argue no evidence links Venezuela’s government to narcotics smuggling.
Venezuelan officials have rejected U.S. claims as a pretext for regime change. Diosdado Cabello, a top Maduro ally, announced troop deployments to border states, framing the move as an anti-narcotics effort. “Venezuela is free of drug trafficking,” he said, citing recent drug and arms seizures.
BrightU.AI‘s Enoch further notes that the nation continuously denies that Maduro is a fentanyl trafficking leader, pointing to its record drug seizures and crackdowns as proof, while dismissing U.S. accusations as pretexts for regime-change efforts.
Analysts warn the escalating rhetoric mirrors Cold War brinkmanship, with Venezuela backed by Russia and China, raising fears of a potential false flag operation to justify U.S. intervention.
The House vote revealed the fragility of Speaker Mike Johnson’s majority, with Republicans scrambling to call back absent lawmakers to block the resolution. Rep. Wesley Hunt (R-TX), who had been campaigning in Texas, rushed back to cast the decisive vote against the measure.
Only two Republicans, Reps. Don Bacon (R-NE) and Thomas Massie (R-KY), joined Democrats in supporting the resolution. Bacon, a retired Air Force officer, expressed frustration with Trump’s aggressive foreign policy: “I’m tired of all the threats.”
Massie warned his party would regret enabling executive overreach: “If we ignore this, we are rendering impotent our branch of government.”
Broader implications for U.S. foreign policy
The failed vote marks the latest instance of Congress ceding war powers to the executive branch – a trend that has accelerated under Trump. Last week, Senate Republicans narrowly defeated a similar resolution after the White House pressured GOP senators to withdraw support.
The standoff highlights broader concerns over unchecked military escalation, particularly as Trump eyes other conflicts abroad. His recent threats against Denmark over Greenland and tariff warnings against NATO allies have further alarmed lawmakers.
For now, the administration insists it has no plans for further military action in Venezuela without congressional approval. But with tensions simmering and geopolitical stakes rising, the debate over war powers is far from over.
Watch the video below that talks about China’s request for the U.S. to release Maduro.
This video is from the alltheworldsastage channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
RT.com
TheGuardian.com
NYTimes.com
BrightU.ai
Brighteon.com
Read full article here