ActBlue’s “magic mortgage” scandal: How Democrats allegedly laundered millions through phantom lending
- Texas AG Ken Paxton mandates ActBlue overhaul its security system after uncovering “magic mortgage” money laundering schemes.
- Election Fairness Institute identifies 422 identical $200K mortgage?based donations tied to ActBlue officers, allegedly laundering $200M across U.S. states.
- Sen. Mark Finchem alleges ActBlue’s flawed systems enable fraud, with forged mortgages and “smurfing” tactics to funnel dark money into Democratic campaigns.
- U.S. Attorneys, IRS and FBI investigate evidence transferred by EFI, citing evasion of federal lender disclosures and violation of FEC rules.
- This scandal deepens scrutiny of political fundraising transparency amid bipartisan demands to reform campaign finance laws.
On August 7, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton announced a landmark victory: ActBlue, the Democratic fundraising giant, had been forced to upgrade its security protocols after revelations of a massive money laundering network. The scandal, uncovered by the Election Fairness Institute (EFI), traces back to a brazen scheme in which ActBlue’s officers allegedly orchestrated $200 million in fraudulent donations through elaborate “magic mortgages.” Over 422 suspicious transactions, all dated June 30, 2023, and targeting junior Senator Maxwell Frost, were found to involve identical donation amounts, fabricated addresses and phone numbers of contributors who had recently moved or changed contact details. The evidence, now under investigation by the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ), has intensified calls for federal oversight of political funding and transparency amid accusations of systemic corruption.
The money laundering mechanism: “Magic mortgages” explained
The EFI’s investigation into ActBlue’s “smurfing” operation reveals a sophisticated process in which small-scale donations are laundered through fictitious real estate transactions.
Sen. Mark Finchem, a key figure in the probe, described the scheme to Real America’s Voice: “ActBlue officers buy a house for $200,000 using a legit bank loan — let’s say through Wells Fargo. Then, minutes later, the same property is magically appraised at $200 million under a hard money loan. This loan, funneled through a shell title company, lacks any lender identification, letting donors anonymously funnel cash into campaigns. We’ve tracked these trails across states — they leave digital footprints, like dust at a crime scene.”
The process exploits gaps in real estate and financial regulations, particularly the FEC’s requirement that donors disclose lender details. By omitting these disclosures via title companies, the scheme bypasses federal oversight, allowing funds to “smurf” into ActBlue accounts as politically innocuous donations. A 2023 EFI report had earlier revealed 422 identical $200 million contributions—all tied to Frost’s campaign — raising suspicions of widespread collusion.
ActBlue’s legal woes and DOJ response
ActBlue’s security failures, highlighted by Paxton’s December 2023 probe, had already revealed another fraud vector: accepting credit card donations without verifying Card Verification Value (CVV) codes. This allowed unauthorized transactions, as Newt Gingrich observed in a November 2024 analysis: “ActBlue’s lax protocols let hackers steal $400 million in this election cycle. Without verifying CVV codes, they made identity theft an open door—and their mortgage shell games make it a superhighway.”
The DOJ now faces mounting pressure to act. Sen. Finchem confirmed he’d shared evidence with the IRS and FBI, urging U.S. attorneys to pursue charges: “We can’t prove it all, but the digital trails are damning. This isn’t just fraud — it’s an assault on election integrity. ActBlue’s officers did this nationwide, and every one of these transactions could fund a thousand more.”
ActBlue has not yet publicly responded to the “magic mortgage” claims, though a spokesperson previously called Paxton’s CVV-code investigation “overblown.”
Broader implications: The crisis of political transparency
The scandal reignites debates over campaign finance reform. Critics argue that progressive organizations like ActBlue have weaponized “small donor” optics to mask large, untraceable contributions. Meanwhile, reports of Democratic parties’ plummeting grassroots fundraising — such as Arizona Democrats’ 75% drop in donoRs—fuels speculation about increasingly desperate financial sleight-of-hand.
Conservative advocates like Finchem frame the issue as a matter of national security: “When a PAC this influential gets so far off the rails, it’s not just a scandal — it’s a threat to democracy. We’ve got to separate propaganda machines from the ballot box.”
The case echoes historical pattern of partisan fundraising abuse. In the 1990s, soft-money loopholes enabled overt donating by corporations to national parties. The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002 aimed to curb such practices, but ActBlue’s rise as a PAC proxy has revived concerns about regulatory loopholes.
A crossroads for campaign finance reform
The ActBlue scandal underscores a simple truth: in an age of digital transactions and opaque PAC networks, maintaining election integrity demands unyielding transparency. As investigations into “magic mortgages” and unverified donations proceed, the pressure grows for Congress to reform the FEC and mandate real-time donor tracking — lest political power descend further into shadow universes of cash. For now, the Democratic fundraising engine lies exposed, its operations under a microscope — and the public grappling with whether trust in elections can survive another breach.
Sources for this article include:
X.com
100percentfedup.com
SAN.com
Read full article here