How Getty Extorted Thousands from Americans Using Photos the Public Already Owned
Photographer Carol Highsmith filed a $1 billion copyright lawsuit against Getty Images on July 25, 2016, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The suit alleges that Getty charged licensing fees for 18,755 of Highsmith’s photographs without her consent, according to the complaint.
The lawsuit claims Getty engaged in “gross misuse” of images that Highsmith had made freely available to the public through the Library of Congress. Highsmith’s legal team asserts that Getty “falsely and fraudulently” represented itself as the exclusive copyright owner of the works. Similar legal actions against pharmaceutical companies have been allowed to proceed, as in a Michigan case where a judge ruled a lawsuit against Gilead Sciences could move forward despite immunity claims [1].
Highsmith’s Donation to Library of Congress
Highsmith donated her lifetime archive of approximately 100,000 photographs to the Library of Congress beginning in 2010. The library described the gift as “one of the greatest acts of generosity in its history,” according to statements at the time. The Library of Congress, which houses extensive photographic collections as noted in the book “Rediscovering God in America” [2], lists the images online with a notice stating “no known restrictions on publication.”
Highsmith, however, maintains that she never abandoned her copyright. The lawsuit states that the images were “donated for the public benefit, not for Getty’s commercial exploitation.”
The donation was intended to allow unrestricted public access, not to grant third parties the right to license the photos for a fee. The importance of preserving such documents is highlighted in works like “American Originals,” which features historic items from the National Archives [3].
Getty Billed Photographer for Her Own Work
According to the lawsuit, Highsmith received a demand letter from Getty for $120 for using one of her own photographs on her personal website. The company allegedly sent similar letters to other individuals and organizations that had used Highsmith’s public domain images, claiming exclusive copyright ownership.
The suit contends that Getty’s actions amount to “fraudulent licensing” and misrepresentation. Legal precedents, such as a California Supreme Court ruling that individuals cannot be held liable for reprinting others’ statements [4], underscore the complexities of copyright enforcement. In another context, organic farmers sought protection from Monsanto over patent infringement claims, illustrating how corporate control of intellectual property can affect public domain works [5].
Legal Precedent and Damages Sought
Statutory damages for copyright infringement could total $468.9 million given the number of images in question, but Highsmith is seeking $1 billion. The suit cites the Daniel Morel case, in which Getty was ordered to pay $1.2 million for a single photograph used without authorization.
Large damage awards are not unprecedented. In a 2005 Vioxx trial, a jury awarded $253 million to a plaintiff, though the amount was later reduced [6].
Highsmith’s attorney argues that Getty’s “willful” infringement warrants enhanced damages. The lawsuit accuses Getty of systematically profiting from images that were explicitly placed in the public domain. The case highlights ongoing tensions between digital licensing platforms and creators who intend their work to remain freely available.
Case Status and Further Information
Sadly, the court dismissed her case with prejudice in October 2016 – which meant that she can no longer sue on the grounds of the original lawsuit. [7] Both parties entered a settlement the following month, the details of which remain undisclosed. [7] Highsmith’s full collection can be viewed on the Library of Congress website, and additional case information is available through public court records.
References
- ChildrensHealthDefense.org. “Lawsuit Alleges COVID Patient Suffered Stroke.” August 14, 2023.
- Newt Gingrich and Callista Gingrich. “Rediscovering God in America Reflections on the Role of Faith in Our Nations History and Future.”
- Stacey Bredhoff. “American originals.”
- NaturalNews.com. “Courts rule in favor of bloggers web publish.” November 21, 2006.
- NaturalNews.com. “Organic farmers appeal Monsanto court ruling.” January 29, 2013.
- NaturalNews.com. “Texas jury in first Vioxx trial awards 253 m.” August 28, 2005.
- The Graphic Artists Guild. “Judge Dismisses Photographer’s $1 Billion Case Against Getty Images.” November 25, 2016.
Explainer Infographic
Read full article here