• Independent researcher Vinu Arumugham suggests that food proteins in vaccines may be driving the rise in food allergies. Injecting food proteins, rather than ingesting them, can sensitize the immune system, leading to allergic reactions.
• The body is designed to tolerate food proteins when eaten, but injecting them can trigger an immune response, defeating natural oral tolerance and causing allergies. This process also applies to other vaccine components like polysaccharides and polyethylene glycol (PEG).
• The link between injected proteins and allergies dates back to the early 1900s, with Nobel Prize-winning research on anaphylaxis by Charles Richet. Despite this, modern immunology has largely ignored these findings.
• In the late 1990s, Japan removed gelatin from vaccines after it was linked to gelatin allergies in children, leading to a significant drop in such allergies. This highlights the potential for food proteins in vaccines to cause allergic sensitization.
• Arumugham and others advocate for urgent reforms, including removing food proteins from vaccines, re-evaluating adjuvants like aluminum, and adding food allergy warnings to vaccine labels. They argue that the current vaccine schedule, with up to 40 shots by adolescence, exacerbates immune system dysfunction and contributes to the allergy epidemic.

In a world where food allergies have become a growing public health crisis, affecting millions of children and adults alike, one question remains largely unasked: Could vaccines be playing a role in this alarming trend? According to independent researcher Vinu Arumugham, the answer is a resounding yes. His groundbreaking work suggests that food proteins in vaccines may be driving the surge in food allergies—a phenomenon that has been understood for over a century but systematically ignored by the medical establishment.

The science behind sensitization

Arumugham, an electronics engineer turned vaccine safety advocate, began his journey into this controversial field after his son developed life-threatening food allergies and asthma. Frustrated by the lack of answers from medical professionals, he delved into the science himself. What he discovered was both startling and illuminating: when food proteins are injected into the body through vaccines, the immune system perceives them as foreign invaders, leading to sensitization and, ultimately, food allergies.

“We aren’t born allergic to food,” Arumugham explained in a recent interview. “Our bodies are designed to tolerate what we eat. But inject proteins instead of ingesting them, and the immune system sees them as invaders. That’s how you create food allergies.”

This process, known as immune sensitization, is not limited to proteins. It also applies to large protein-like molecules such as polysaccharides and polyethylene glycol (PEG), which are commonly found in vaccines. Arumugham’s research highlights a critical distinction: the human body has evolved to introduce food proteins through the mouth, not through injection. Eating foods leads to the development of oral tolerance, whereas injecting those proteins can defeat this tolerance and trigger an immune response.

A century-old discovery ignored

The connection between injected proteins and allergic reactions is not new. In fact, it dates back to the early 1900s, when French physiologist Charles Richet won the Nobel Prize for his discovery of anaphylaxis. Richet demonstrated that injecting small amounts of a substance could sensitize the body, leading to severe allergic reactions upon subsequent exposure. His work laid the foundation for understanding how vaccines could prime the immune system to react abnormally to benign substances.

Despite Richet’s groundbreaking findings, this knowledge has been largely ignored or dismissed by modern immunology. As Arumugham noted, “The first dose of the vaccine causes the development of allergies. Subsequent doses are booster shots for food allergy. With more shots being added to vaccine schedules, more people develop allergies, and more severe the allergies.”

The Japanese example

One of the most compelling pieces of evidence supporting Arumugham’s claims comes from Japan. In the late 1990s, researchers discovered that gelatin-containing vaccines were causing gelatin allergies in children. The Japanese government responded by removing gelatin from all vaccines in 2000, leading to a significant drop in gelatin allergies.

This case study underscores a critical point: food proteins in vaccines can and do cause allergic sensitization. Yet, regulators today are not even testing for protein contamination, and vaccine manufacturers are actively blocking access to vials to prevent scrutiny.

The role of adjuvants and vaccine schedules

Arumugham’s research also points to the role of adjuvants—substances like aluminum compounds that are added to vaccines to enhance the immune response. These adjuvants not only increase the immunogenicity of injected food proteins but also bias the immune system toward allergic reactions.

Compounding the problem is the modern vaccine schedule, which includes up to 40 shots by adolescence, with as many as five administered simultaneously. This combination of multiple food proteins and adjuvants creates a perfect storm for immune system dysfunction, contributing to the rise in food allergies, asthma and other allergic diseases.

A call for urgent action

Given the scale and severity of the food allergy epidemic, Arumugham and other researchers are calling for urgent changes to vaccine policy. These include removing food proteins from vaccines, re-evaluating the use of adjuvants like aluminum compounds, and including food allergy warnings in vaccine package inserts.

“The evidence is clear,” Arumugham said. “We need to stop injecting proteins into children before they’ve had a chance to eat them. This is not just about preventing allergies—it’s about protecting the health and well-being of future generations.”

The bigger picture

The implications of Arumugham’s research extend far beyond food allergies. They challenge the very foundation of modern vaccinology and raise important questions about the safety and efficacy of current vaccine practices.

As the medical establishment continues to dismiss these concerns, the burden falls on independent researchers and concerned parents to demand transparency and accountability.

Sources include:

TheExpose.com

Substack.com

Substack.com

Papers.ssrn.com