• In Elbert County, Georgia, stands the Georgia Guidestones, often referred to as “America’s Stonehenge,” bearing inscriptions in twelve languages with cryptic messages and controversial directives, including reducing global population to fewer than 500 million.
• The Guidestones are part of a larger narrative involving influential figures, organizations and debates about population control, as explored in Jim Marrs’ book “Population Control: How Corporate Owners are Killing Us.”
• Notable figures like Prince Philip and Maxwell Taylor have expressed views on reducing global population, particularly in less developed countries, through controversial means such as disease, starvation and conflict.
• Researchers argue that the overpopulation threat is not about population growth but rather population density and resource distribution, questioning the validity of population control policies.
• The discussion of population control raises ethical and democratic questions, especially regarding the targeting of specific populations and the acceptability of methods, as seen in historical eugenics and forced sterilization programs.

In the rural outskirts of Elbert County, Georgia, stands a mysterious granite structure known as the Georgia Guidestones, often referred to as “America’s Stonehenge.” Commissioned in 1979 by a man using the pseudonym Robert C. Christian, the Guidestones bear inscriptions in eight modern and four ancient languages, offering a blend of cryptic messages and unsettling directives.

Among these is a call to reduce the global population to fewer than 500 million, a directive that has sparked controversy and raised questions about the motives behind such an audacious vision. This plot is outlined in great detail by Jim Marrs in his book “Population Control: How Corporate Owners are Killing Us.”

The Georgia Guidestones are just one piece of a larger puzzle that intersects with a darker chapter in global history—a narrative involving influential figures, shadowy organizations and contentious ideas about population control. This story delves into how these ideas have shaped policies and sparked debates about justice, democracy and the future of humanity.

The Guidestones’ message is both fascinating and chilling. Among its ten major directives is a call for humanity to reduce global population levels to achieve a “perpetual balance with nature.”

At a time when the world population is nearing 8 billion, such a directive implies drastic measures, leaving many to wonder: Who decides which populations should be reduced, and by what means?

The Guidestones are not an isolated anomaly. Similar ideas have been championed by notable figures, including the late Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh. In a 1981 interview, Philip remarked, “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus.”

While some interpreted his statement as dark humor, others saw it as a part of a broader belief among some globalist leaders that overpopulation poses the gravest threat to humanity.

Prince Philip was not alone in this belief. Maxwell Taylor, the former chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, suggested in 1974 that reducing the global population – particularly in less developed countries – would require drastic measures, including the use of disease, starvation and regional conflicts. These ideas were echoed in the classified 1974 Kissinger Report, which warned that rapid population growth in poorer nations posed a threat to the national security of the United States. The report proposed covert strategies to limit population growth, including the use of birth control and, more controversially, war and famine.

Such policies may have influenced the wars and airstrikes in the Middle East, with some critics arguing that these conflicts were partially motivated by a desire to reduce population levels in the region.

Yet, the very premise of overpopulation as an existential threat has been challenged by researchers who argue that the issue is not one of population growth but rather population density and resource distribution.

For instance, according to the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, the state alone could theoretically accommodate over twice the world’s current population if each person were granted just 100 square feet of living space.

Despite such counterarguments, the narrative of overpopulation continues to be propagated by influential figures and organizations. In 2009, a group of prominent American billionaires, including Bill Gates, met in a private Manhattan home to form a group known as the “Good Club.” According to leaked reports, the group discussed concerns about human overpopulation and pledged to support strategies aimed at curbing population growth.

Such discussions are not confined to the private sector. The federal government has also been implicated in controversial population control measures.

In the early 1970s, Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg hinted that the landmark Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortion, was partly motivated by a desire to reduce populations deemed “undesirable.”

Ginsburg was reportedly influenced by the writings of John Holdren, a leading figure in the population control movement who, along with Paul and Anne Ehrlich, co-authored the 1977 book “Ecoscience.” The book advocated for extreme measures, including involuntary sterilization and the use of sterilizing chemicals in water supplies.

While Holdren later distanced himself from these ideas, his past statements continue to raise questions about the ethical motivations behind population control policies.

The discussion of population control raises profound ethical and democratic concerns. Who decides which populations should be targeted? And what methods are deemed acceptable?

These questions are particularly troubling in light of historical examples of eugenics and forced sterilization programs, which have disproportionately affected marginalized communities.

Learn more about Jim Marrs’ book “Population Control: How Corporate Owners are Killing Us” by watching this video.

This video is from the BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

Brighteon.ai

Brighteon.com