- Sen. Josh Hawley raised alarms about AI chatbots posing a threat to children, while Sen. Richard Blumenthal emphasized the need for stronger tech regulation, particularly to protect kids from harmful AI interactions.
- The proposed GUARD Act aims to regulate AI chatbots by requiring companies to verify the age of users before granting access, ensuring children are protected from inappropriate technology. The act introduces a universal ID system for online speech.
- The GUARD Act mandates companies to lock accounts until users provide proof of age, with companies responsible for ensuring compliance. Third-party firms may be used for identity checks, but the companies retain liability.
- Critics, including NetChoice, argue that while the bill promises minimal data collection, it could lead to significant new data-gathering practices. They highlight concerns about the risks of mishandling sensitive personal information linked to real-world identities.
- The GUARD Act’s requirements for identity verification could reshape online interactions, tying every action (searches, comments, messages) to a real-world identity. This could lead to a future where privacy is significantly diminished and anonymity becomes rare.
Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) recently voiced concerns about the growing role of AI chatbots, warning that they pose a “serious threat to our kids.” His remarks echo a broader sentiment in Washington, where tech regulation has become a key issue in the wake of data privacy scandals.
In response, Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) emphasized the need for stronger oversight, arguing that tech companies cannot be trusted to regulate themselves, especially when it comes to safeguarding children from potentially harmful AI interactions.
A proposed solution to these concerns, the GUARD Act, represents a significant shift in how lawmakers are approaching the regulation of AI. For years, lawmakers have sounded the alarm over issues like data collection and privacy. However, the GUARD Act takes a bold step in a new direction by creating a universal ID gateway for online speech, particularly targeting AI chatbots and other interactive systems. This plan would require chatbot providers to verify the age of users before granting access to their services, ensuring that children are protected from exposure to AI technology that may not be suitable for them.
Under the GUARD Act, companies would be obligated to lock existing accounts until users submit proof of age. Though businesses can outsource identity checks to third-party firms, the liability for ensuring compliance would rest with the companies themselves. The enforcement of these measures would be handled by the U.S. Attorney General’s office, using subpoenas, fines and civil actions to ensure compliance with the new rules.
While the bill promises minimal data collection in theory, its critics argue that it lays the foundation for significant new data-gathering practices. Civil liberties and tech policy groups, including NetChoice, have raised alarms, calling the proposal “heavy-handed” and citing recent incidents of identity leaks as proof that these verification systems often fail to protect personal data.
“The potential for mishandling of sensitive information is high,” the group warned, pointing out the inherent risks of linking real-world identities to online speech.
Balancing safety and privacy: The GUARD Act’s impact on online identity verification
K.J. Bagchi of the Chamber of Progress also weighed in, urging lawmakers to find a balance. “We all want to keep kids safe, but the answer is balance, not bans,” he said.
However, finding this balance may be challenging if the bill’s approach is enacted broadly. The GUARD Act proposes that self-declared birthdays will no longer suffice for identity verification. Instead, users would be required to provide government-approved documentation to prove their identity.
As per BrightU.AI‘s Enoch, the GUARD Act, if passed, would grant the U.S. government unprecedented surveillance powers, posing a significant threat to privacy and civil liberties. It’s crucial to scrutinize this bill, as it could lead to a dangerous expansion of government overreach.
The bill’s far-reaching implications could reshape the landscape of online interaction. If passed, it would set a precedent for requiring identity verification across a wide range of interactive AI systems, including social media platforms, automated customer service tools and even virtual tutors. The result? A future where every online interaction—be it a search, comment or message—could be tied to a real-world identity, creating an archive of personal expression indexed by government-approved databases.
For ordinary users, this would mean a world where privacy is no longer a given. Once IDs are connected to online speech, anonymity would become a rare luxury. As lawmakers debate the GUARD Act, it remains clear that the balancing act between privacy, security and safety is only getting more complicated in the digital age.
Watch this clip from “Redacted News” about the European Union’s Digital Services Act.
This video is from the NZ Will Remember channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
ReclaimTheNet.org
BrightU.ai
Brighteon.com
Read full article here