• Justice Alexandre de Moraes issued an arrest warrant for a U.S. citizen for political speech made in the U.S., raising concerns about Brazil’s infringement on U.S. sovereignty and the First Amendment.
• Moraes’ actions are part of a broader campaign to suppress dissent, targeting social media companies and users who oppose censorship.
• Moraes ordered the suspension of X (formerly Twitter) in Brazil and imposed fines on those defying his orders.
• X’s legal team argued that Moraes’ actions violate Brazil’s Constitution and Civil Rights Framework for the Internet.
• International observers describe Moraes’ actions as an assault on free speech, questioning the future of Brazilian democracy and its international standing.

Alexandre de Moraes, a justice of Brazil’s Supreme Federal Court (STF), has once again thrust himself into the global spotlight with his pro-censorship stance.

The magistrate recently issued an arrest warrant against Flavia Cordeiro Magalhaes, a naturalized U.S. citizen of Brazilian origin. Magalhaes, who has lived in Florida for over two decades, is being targeted for political speech expressed on U.S. soil. This move raises alarming questions about Brazil’s infringement on U.S. sovereignty and its disregard for the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

Paulo Faria, Magalhaes’ legal representative in Brazil, has condemned the arrest warrant as an overreach. He also revealed that he has repeatedly been denied access to case files, highlighting the lack of transparency in Brazil’s justice system under Moraes’ leadership.

“The defense continues to press for the revision of the arrest and for the transparency of the process, while the opposition to the Brazilian government denounces the censorship and the persecution of dissenting voices,” said Faria.

The case stems from a 2022 post on X (formerly Twitter), which the STF justice ordered blocked in Brazil. Magalhaes claims she was never notified of the block and continued posting, leading Moraes to accuse her of contempt of court. Despite traveling to Brazil legally in December 2023 using her U.S. passport, the magistrate bizarrely treated this as the use of a “false document” and issued a pre-trial detention order in February 2024.

This case is emblematic of Moraes’ broader campaign to stifle dissent, both within Brazil and abroad. His actions suggest a troubling belief that Brazilian courts can impose their jurisdiction on foreign citizens and territories – a direct challenge to U.S. laws protecting free speech.

Free speech under siege: Moraes’ aggressive crackdown on X and Musk

Moraes’ crackdown on free speech is not limited to individuals. He has also targeted U.S. social media companies, most notably Elon Musk’s X (formerly Twitter). In April 2024, the magistrate launched an investigation on X, accusing the Tesla and SpaceX CEO of “obstruction of justice” and “incitement to crime.” (Related: Brazil to axe X from telecommunications network after citing Elon Musk for obstruction of justice for his refusal to engage in government-demanded censorship.)

The probe followed Musk’s refusal to comply with demands to censor political opponents. Things came to a head in late August 2024, when Moraes ordered the suspension of X in Brazil. The magistrate also announced a daily fine of $8,900 on Brazilians using a virtual private network to access the banned platform.

At the time Moraes launched the investigation, Musk called the justice’s censorship “aggressive” and vowed to publish all of his unreasonable demands. “This [magistrate] has brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution and people of Brazil. He should resign or be impeached,” Musk said.

X’s legal team also argued that Moraes’ orders violate Brazil’s Federal Constitution and Civil Rights Framework for the Internet. “The people of Brazil, regardless of their political beliefs, are entitled to freedom of speech, due process and transparency from their own authorities,” it wrote.

Despite these protests, Moraes has doubled down, threatening fines and even imprisonment for those who defy his orders. The magistrate’s actions have drawn sharp criticism from international observers.

Journalist Michael Shellenberger described Brasilia’s crackdown as “a sweeping assault on free speech,” noting that Moraes has jailed individuals without trial for social media posts and demanded the removal of users and specific content without due process. Shellenberger’s reporting revealed that Moraes sought to “weaponize Twitter’s content moderation policies” against supporters of former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, underscoring the politicized nature of his censorship campaign.

The implications of Moraes’ actions extend far beyond Brazil. By targeting U.S. citizens and companies, he is testing the limits of international law and challenging the principles of free speech enshrined in the U.S. Constitution.

Visit Censorship.news for more similar stories.

Watch Alex Jones of InfoWars discussing the feud between Elon Musk and Alexandre de Moraes in this clip.

This video is from the InfoWars channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

Rumble forced to exit Brazil amid crackdown on independent media.

Trump Media, Rumble sue Brazilian judge over censorship of U.S. conservatives.

Brazil’s supreme court orders SHUTDOWN of Elon Musk’s X to silence speech they can’t control.

Sources include:

ReclaimTheNet.org

HumanEvents.com

NTD.com

Brighteon.com