Lost scriptures & church power: Scholar examines Bible’s hidden history and modern faith
- Biblical Inconsistencies Exposed: Matthew McWhorter’s research reveals conflicting versions of the Bible across Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox traditions, raising questions about authenticity and doctrinal manipulation.
- Politics of Canonization: Early church authorities selectively preserved texts that consolidated their power while suppressing others, creating inconsistencies in which books are deemed “holy” or excluded.
- Excluded Texts & Transparency: Books like the Gospel of Thomas and Book of Enoch were sidelined—McWhorter urges believers to question whether this was due to heresy or ecclesiastical control.
- Faith Requires Evidence: McWhorter argues that Christianity’s foundational claims (like the Resurrection) depend on reliable texts—blind acceptance risks perpetuating institutional corruption and false narratives.
- A Call for Critical Faith: In an era of institutional distrust, believers must scrutinize scripture with the same rigor as legal evidence, demanding intellectual honesty in faith and beyond.
In an era where institutional trust is at an all-time low—whether in government, medicine, or media—one theologian is urging believers to scrutinize the origins of their faith with the same rigor as legal evidence. Matthew McWhorter, a former Ivy League lawyer turned biblical scholar, joins Mike Adams on Brighteon.com to discuss his groundbreaking investigation into early Christian texts and the politics of canonization. His book, Canon Crossfire, challenges mainstream narratives about scripture, exposing inconsistencies between Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox Bibles while probing the exclusion of ancient texts like the Book of Enoch and the Gospel of Thomas.
From Skeptic to Scholar: A Journey of Faith and Evidence
McWhorter’s journey into biblical research began after a life-altering health crisis—a heart attack and cancer diagnosis within 30 days of each other. Facing mortality, he turned to the texts he had long ignored, including the Bible. But what he discovered shocked him: not one unified scripture, but a labyrinth of conflicting versions.
“There’s a Catholic Bible, Protestant Bibles—each with different books—Orthodox Bibles that diverge further,” McWhorter explains. “Even within Protestantism, translations vary wildly.” Determined to uncover the truth, he spent five years meticulously comparing over 100 biblical commentaries, line by line, to discern authentic scripture from centuries of doctrinal manipulation.
The Politics of Canonization: Who Decided What Was “Holy”?
McWhorter’s research reveals a disturbing pattern: early church authorities selectively preserved texts that consolidated their power while suppressing others. “The same evidence used to authenticate the Gospels is ignored when applied to excluded books,” he says. “If we dismiss one, we undermine the credibility of the entire Bible.”
For example, Protestant scholars often cite early church fathers like Irenaeus to validate the four Gospels—yet those same fathers also affirmed books like Baruch, now relegated to Catholic and Orthodox canons. “Why accept their testimony in one case but not the other?” McWhorter asks. “It’s inconsistent, and inconsistency destroys credibility.”
Lost Scriptures and Modern Faith
Among the most controversial excluded texts is the Gospel of Thomas, which some scholars argue contains authentic sayings of Jesus. McWhorter doesn’t advocate for its inclusion but insists believers deserve transparency: “Were these books heretical, or were they deliberately sidelined to centralize ecclesiastical authority?”
His work echoes broader concerns about institutional corruption—whether in Big Pharma’s suppression of natural medicine or governments rewriting history. “If we don’t question how we got our Bible,” McWhorter warns, “we risk perpetuating the same manipulation that plagues every powerful institution.”
A Call to Intellectual Honesty
McWhorter’s message is clear: faith should not mean blind acceptance. “Christianity claims Jesus rose from the dead—but that claim hinges on the reliability of the texts documenting it,” he argues. “If we can’t authenticate those texts, we’re building on sand.”
His challenge to believers is profound: Investigate. Compare. Demand evidence. In a world drowning in disinformation, McWhorter’s work is a beacon for those seeking truth—not just in scripture, but in every arena where power dictates narrative.
Watch the full episode of the “Health Ranger Report” with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and Matthew McWhorter as they talk about the Lost Knowledge Behind Scripture and the Eyewitness Case for Christianity.
This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
The rise and fall of the Library of Alexandria: A legacy of knowledge lost to time
Science meets scripture: New evidence shows how Adam and Eve may have existed
Sacrilege and statecraft: How Christian Zionism distorts scripture to serve empire
Sources include:
Brighteon.com
Canoncrossfire.com
Read full article here