• State Farm seeks a 22% emergency rate hike for homeowners in California, citing $1 billion in wildfire payouts and financial strain.
• Critics argue the hike is unjustified, pointing to State Farm’s $1.4 billion in underwriting profits.
• The insurer’s request includes a 15% increase for condo owners and a 38% rise for rental dwellings, sparking outrage among consumer advocates.
• California faces an insurance crisis as major insurers reduce coverage or exit due to rising wildfire risks and reconstruction costs.

In the wake of devastating wildfires that ravaged Los Angeles County earlier this year, State Farm, California’s largest home insurer, is pushing for an emergency rate hike averaging 22% for homeowners, sparking outrage among consumer advocates and policyholders.

The company, which insures 20% of the wildfire-affected areas, claims the fires have left it in “dire” financial straits, citing over 8,700 claims and $1 billion in payouts so far. But critics argue the request is unjustified, pointing to the insurer’s massive profits and $135 billion in reserves held by its parent company.

As insurers flee California, leaving homeowners in a precarious position, State Farm’s latest move raises questions about who should bear the cost of disaster recovery.

A dire request or corporate greed?

State Farm’s request, submitted Monday to California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, seeks not only a 22% increase for homeowners but also a 15% hike for condo owners and a staggering 38% rise for rental dwellings. The company claims the hikes are necessary to rebuild its capital base and ensure it can continue operating in the state.

However, consumer advocacy groups like Consumer Watchdog are pushing back, accusing State Farm of exploiting a tragedy to pad its profits. “This request is really outrageous for an emergency increase,” said Carmen Balber, executive director of Consumer Watchdog. “If the company has numbers to show it deserves an increase, it can go through the regular process. To this point, State Farm has only delayed and refused to respond to requests both from Consumer Watchdog and from the Department of Insurance to prove the rate increase itself was justified.”

Balber also highlighted that State Farm’s parent company has $135 billion in reserves and that the insurer made $1.4 billion in underwriting profits from 2020 to 2022. “If anyone should be bailing out State Farm in California, it’s the parent company,” she said.

Insurers flee as wildfire risks soar

State Farm’s request comes amid a broader insurance crisis in California, where rising wildfire risks and soaring reconstruction costs have driven major insurers like Allstate, Nationwide, and Farmers to either reduce coverage or exit the state entirely. In March 2024, State Farm announced it would not renew 72,000 home and apartment policies in California, citing outdated state regulations and escalating risks.

The January 2025 wildfires, which burned over 57,600 acres and destroyed more than 16,200 structures, only exacerbated the situation. State Farm’s latest rate hike proposal follows a 20% increase approved in March 2023 and a 30% request last July that remains pending. If approved, the new hikes would take effect May 1, 2025, adding financial strain to homeowners already grappling with the aftermath of disaster.

A balancing act for regulators

The California Department of Insurance has vowed to review State Farm’s request with “urgency and transparency,” emphasizing that any rate hike must comply with Proposition 103, a 1988 ballot measure that gives the commissioner authority to adjust or reject proposed increases. “To protect millions of California consumers and the integrity of our residential property insurance market, the department will respond with urgency and transparency to recommend a course of action for Commissioner Lara,” the department said in a statement.

But critics argue that approving the hike would set a dangerous precedent. “It’s shameful for State Farm to be trying to take advantage of this tragedy and make money on the backs of California homeowners who are trying to recover,” Balber said.

As California homeowners face the dual challenges of wildfire recovery and rising insurance costs, State Farm’s request for a 22% rate hike underscores the growing tension between corporate profits and consumer protection. With insurers fleeing the state and regulators under pressure to stabilize the market, the question remains: Should disaster-stricken homeowners bear the brunt of the financial burden, or should insurers with billions in reserves step up to share the cost?

For now, the answer lies in the hands of Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara, whose decision will have far-reaching implications for California’s insurance landscape.

Sources for this article include:

ABC7.com

LATimes.com

FoxBusiness.com