The Facts 2017” questions the prevailing narrative and encourages a more nuanced discussion on climate change – NaturalNews.com

• The book “Climate Change: The Facts 2017,” edited by Jennifer Marohasy, presents a contentious viewpoint by questioning the prevailing narrative on climate change and advocating for a more nuanced discussion.
• The book highlights the concept of natural climate cycles, with contributions from Ian Plimer and Dr. Nicola Scafetta, who argue that modern climate change is not fundamentally different from past variations and is influenced by natural factors like solar luminosity and lunar gravitational effects.
• The contributors challenge the mainstream narrative on carbon dioxide’s impact on climate, suggesting that claims of catastrophic temperature increases due to CO2 are based on speculative models and lack experimental foundation in radiative physics.
• Dr. Peter Ridd criticizes the focus on the Great Barrier Reef as a symbol of environmental disaster, arguing that corals have adaptive mechanisms to cope with changing temperatures and Dr. Craig Idso emphasizes the positive effects of increased CO2 on plant productivity and agricultural yields.

In a world where climate change has become a polarizing and often emotionally charged topic, the book “Climate Change: The Facts 2017,” edited by Jennifer Marohasy, offers a compelling and controversial perspective. Released at a time when the global community is grappling with how to address climate change, this collection of essays by prominent climate skeptics aims to challenge the prevailing narrative and encourage a more nuanced discussion.

One of the central themes of the book is the concept of natural climate cycles, a perspective championed by Ian Plimer, one of Australia’s most respected geologists. Plimer argues that climate change is not a new phenomenon but rather a recurring pattern that has been occurring for millions of years. He asserts that there is no extraordinary evidence to suggest that modern climate change is fundamentally different from past variations. According to Plimer, the rates of temperature change, sea-level rise and biota turnover observed today are comparable to those of previous eras.

Dr. Nicola Scafetta from the University of Napoli Federico II further supports this view by highlighting the influence of natural cycles on climate. He points to variations in solar luminosity and the gravitational effects of the Moon as significant factors that can drive climate change. Ken Ring, a long-range weather forecaster, adds that the Moon’s orbit around the Earth can impact local weather patterns, contributing to broader climate trends.

The book also challenges the mainstream narrative on the physics of carbon dioxide (CO2). Many university professors, often cited as part of the alleged 97 percent consensus on climate change, claim that a doubling of atmospheric CO2 would lead to catastrophic temperature increases. However, the contributors to “Climate Change: The Facts 2017” argue that these claims are based on speculative calculations and computer-simulation models that lack a solid experimental foundation in radiative physics.

Professor Svante Arrhenius, the chemist who first proposed the idea of CO2-induced warming in 1896, made his calculations before the advent of modern high-resolution spectroscopy. Measurements from spectroscopy suggest that the climate’s sensitivity to CO2 has been grossly overestimated and these overestimations persist in the models used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) today.

The issue of ocean acidification is also addressed in the book. Dr. Peter Ridd from James Cook University criticizes the way science is funded and reported, suggesting that inconvenient facts are often ignored in favor of popular theories. He argues that the focus on the Great Barrier Reef as a symbol of environmental disaster is misplaced. According to Ridd, corals have developed remarkable mechanisms to adapt to changing temperatures, such as selecting different species of symbionts to cope with prevailing conditions. This ability to shuffle symbionts means that corals that bleach in one year can recover and become less susceptible to similar high temperatures in subsequent years.

Dr. Craig Idso from the Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change emphasizes the positive effects of rising CO2 levels on plant productivity. He highlights the significant improvements in agricultural crop yields over recent decades, attributing these gains to the powerful and positive effect of increased atmospheric CO2.

Dr. Matt Ridley, a science journalist and member of the U.K. House of Lords, argues that global warming is doing more good than harm, particularly through the “greening” of the planet. Dr. Bjørn Lomborg from the Copenhagen Business School explains that adhering to the Paris Accord will be very expensive while having little impact on the global climate.

Simon Breheny from the Institute of Public Affairs emphasizes the need for critical thinking and the introduction of alternative ideas into the climate debate. He points out that some in academia are attempting to extend the criminal law to punish those who challenge the so-called “scientific consensus” on climate change. This notion of a “consensus” is more aligned with modern politics than traditional science, which thrives on skepticism and debate.

In conclusion, “Climate Change: The Facts 2017” is a provocative and thought-provoking book that challenges readers to reconsider their assumptions about climate change. It calls for a more rigorous and systematic audit of scientific research, particularly when it comes to issues as significant as the Great Barrier Reef.

Learn more about climate change by watching the video below.

This video is from the BrightLearn channel on Brighteon.com.

Sources include:

Brighteon.ai

Brighteon.com