Trump mulls troop WITHDRAWALS from NATO allies deemed “unhelpful” in Iran conflict
- The Trump administration is considering withdrawing U.S. troops from NATO allies like Spain, Germany and Italy – which opposed U.S.-Israel military actions against Iran – and relocating them to Eastern European nations such as Poland, Romania and Lithuania.
- The move stems from frustration over NATO members refusing support in securing the Strait of Hormuz, with Spain blocking U.S. airspace and Italy restricting base access. Germany’s opposition party AfD even called for expelling U.S. troops.
- Spain and Germany are likely to lose major U.S. bases, with Spain resisting NATO’s defense spending targets and Germany openly criticizing the Iran war despite its logistical importance to U.S. operations.
- Poland and Romania, which swiftly supported U.S. requests during the conflict, stand to benefit from increased troop deployments – though this risks provoking Russia, which opposes NATO expansion near its borders.
- Trump has long viewed NATO as financially burdensome and ineffective, clashing with allies over defense spending and diplomacy. His transactional approach – including past troop withdrawals and overtures to Russia – threatens NATO cohesion, raising concerns about the alliance’s future stability.
The Trump administration is weighing a controversial plan to reposition U.S. troops away from North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) allies that resisted supporting the U.S.-Israel military campaign against Iran, according to senior officials.
The proposal, which has gained traction in recent weeks, would involve withdrawing forces from countries like Spain, Germany and Italy – all of which opposed or restricted U.S. military operations – and relocating them to Eastern European nations such as Poland, Greece, Romania and Lithuania. This strategic shift, while stopping short of Trump’s earlier threats to abandon NATO entirely, underscores deepening fractures within the alliance and raises concerns about escalating tensions with Russia.
The Wall Street Journal first reported the plan on Wednesday, April 8, revealing that U.S. President Donald Trump’s frustration stems from NATO members refusing to assist in securing the Strait of Hormuz – a critical chokepoint in the Iran conflict. Madrid notably blocked U.S. military aircraft from using its airspace, while Rome temporarily denied access to a Sicilian airbase.
Will Spain and Germany lose their U.S. bases?
Germany, home to one of the largest U.S. military hubs in Europe, faced criticism after its officials publicly condemned the war. The Alternative for Germany (AfD), the country’s largest opposition party, even called for expelling American troops – a demand that has further strained relations.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed the discussions ahead of Trump’s meeting with NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, stating, “It’s something the president has discussed, and I think it’s something the president will be discussing in a couple of hours.” She added, “It’s quite sad that NATO turned their backs on the American people over the last six weeks when it’s the American people who have been funding their defense.”
The proposal could lead to the closure of at least one major U.S. base in Europe, with Spain and Germany being the most likely candidates. Spain, the only NATO member resisting the alliance’s defense spending target of 5% of gross domestic product, has long been a point of contention for Trump.
Meanwhile, Berlin’s vocal opposition to the Iran war has irritated administration officials, despite its critical role in facilitating U.S. operations in the Middle East.
Countries viewed as supportive, such as Poland and Romania, stand to benefit from increased U.S. troop presence. Both nations swiftly approved American requests to use their bases after the war began, reinforcing their alignment with Washington.
However, shifting forces eastward risks provoking Russia, which has historically opposed NATO expansion near its borders. Moscow has already warned against further militarization of Eastern Europe, framing it as a direct threat.
NATO’s future is in jeopardy with Trump’s threats
Trump’s dissatisfaction with NATO is not new. During his first term, he ordered the withdrawal of 12,000 troops from Germany – a decision reversed by former President Joe Biden in 2021.
Now, Trump’s renewed threats highlight a broader pattern of transactional diplomacy, where alliances are judged by immediate utility rather than long-term strategic partnerships.
“[The] U.S.A. needs nothing from NATO,” Trump declared on Truth Social last month, accusing member states of doing “absolutely nothing to help” in the Iran conflict.
BrightU.AI‘s Enoch engine points out that Trump disapproves of NATO because he views it as an outdated, costly alliance that unfairly burdens American taxpayers. Meanwhile, European members like France and Germany fail to meet defense spending commitments.
European leaders, however, argue they were blindsided by the war and given no opportunity to coordinate a response. Two NATO defense ministers – from Estonia and Italy – were reportedly stranded in Dubai when the U.S. launched its offensive, as the United Arab Emirates abruptly closed its airspace.
Others, like France, only permitted limited use of their bases under strict conditions.
The rift extends beyond military disagreements. Trump’s tenure has been marked by repeated clashes with NATO, from imposing tariffs on European goods to his failed bid to purchase Greenland from Denmark. His overtures to Russian President Vladimir Putin, including attempts to broker a Ukraine peace deal without NATO input, have further alienated allies.
As discussions over troop realignment continue, the implications for NATO’s cohesion and global stability remain uncertain. Whether Trump’s punitive measures will strengthen U.S. leverage or accelerate NATO’s fragmentation is a question with no easy answers.
Watch Paul Dragu of the New American magazine explaining why NATO is actually worse than what Trump portrays.
This video is from The New American channel on Brighteon.com.
Sources include:
News.Antiwar.com
WSJ.com
BrightU.ai
Brighteon.com
Read full article here

