• The US doubled its troop presence in Syria to 2,000.
• Washington is considering sending a delegation to meet Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), despite HTS being previously designated as a terrorist group.
• The US is willing to engage with the new Syrian government if certain conditions are met.
• Israel has bombed numerous targets in Syria, extending its buffer zone in the Golan Heights.
• The US’s support for HTS may be a result of Israel’s influence in US foreign policy.

US doubles its military presence in Syria, preparing for regime change

It’s a curious sight to behold: the United States, a global superpower known for its unequivocal stance against terrorism, now finds itself cozying up to Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a group it had previously designated as a terror organization. This twist of fate has many asking: is the US government putting blind faith in Israel’s proxies in Syria?

According to recent revelations, the US has quietly doubled its military presence in Syria, swelling the troop numbers from approximately 900 to 2,000 soldiers. This move, coupled with the US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s announcement of potential direct contact with HTS, paints a picture of a nation caught between strategic interests and moral obligations.

The situation is further complicated by Israel’s role in the region. Since the fall of the Assad regime, Israel has unleashed a series of air strikes, hitting more than 500 targets in Syria. This aggressive posture has raised eyebrows, particularly given the US’s newfound interest in HTS. Mouin Rabbani, a fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, points out the delicate dance Jolani, HTS’s leader, must perform to secure US recognition. “Jolani understands the minute he utters the word Israel, he’s going to have a problem with the West,” Rabbani explains.

So, what gives? Why would the US, a nation built on the principles of democracy and human rights, pivot so dramatically to embrace a group it has long considered a terrorist threat? The answer, to some, lies in the unspoken alliances and dependencies that have long defined US foreign policy. Israel, a crucial ally of the US, has a significant say in Middle Eastern affairs, and it seems that the US is bending over backward to accommodate its interests.

The European Union and the UK have also signaled their intentions to return to Damascus, potentially viewing the post-Assad Syria as a new frontier for diplomatic engagement and economic opportunity. In this context, the US’s cautious approach to recognizing the new Syrian government is a balancing act between competing interests.

However, this shift in policy raises red flags for critics of US foreign policy. Has the US forgotten its own values in pursuit of geopolitical gains? Is the principle of fighting terrorism being compromised for the sake of short-term strategic objectives? These are questions that need to be addressed, not swept under the rug.

US de-lists terror group from its terror watch list

The move by the US to potentially de-list HTS from its terror watch list is particularly concerning. State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller’s reluctance to immediately de-list the group speaks to the complexity of the situation. Yet, the fact remains that the US is moving closer to engaging directly with HTS, a group that has been responsible for a multitude of atrocities in Syria. The US has a track record of bringing terror to the Middle East to bring about regime change.

While lifting sanctions on Syria could be a crucial step in rebuilding the war-torn country, it should not come at the cost of ignoring the very real human rights abuses committed by groups like HTS. The humanitarian impact of these decisions cannot be understated, with Ziadeh, a senior fellow at the Arab Center Washington DC, emphasizing the dire situation faced by Syrian citizens.

As the dust settles in Syria, it’s clear that the US’s foreign policy decisions will have far-reaching implications for the region. What is certain is that the people of Syria deserve a government that respects their rights and aspirations. The US’s path forward must be guided by a commitment to justice and human dignity, but its track record for working with terrorist groups and genocidal regimes to prop up regime change cannot be ignored.

Sources include:

MiddleEastEye.net

MiddleEastEye.net

MiddleEastEye.net