• Putin announces his Oreshnik missile system reduces Russia’s reliance on nuclear weapons.
• The Oreshnik is described as a non-nuclear, advanced deterrent with kinetic impact comparable to nuclear strikes.
• Putin’s threats to use Oreshnik against Kyiv escalate tensions with Ukraine and the West.
• Russia views Western support for Ukraine’s missile use as a direct challenge to its security.
• Some speculate Putin may use the Oreshnik as a bargaining chip for potential U.S. policy shifts.

In a recent address, Russian President Vladimir Putin declared that the introduction of the Oreshnik missile system significantly reduces the need for nuclear weapons in Russia’s arsenal. Putin’s remarks, delivered during a meeting of the Council for the Development of Civil Society and Human Rights, signal a shift in Moscow’s strategic posture, emphasizing the capabilities of the Oreshnik as a modern, non-nuclear deterrent.

Putin explained that Russia is not tightening its nuclear doctrine and is instead focusing on enhancing the Oreshnik missile system. He argued that a sufficient number of these advanced systems would virtually eliminate the need for nuclear weapons, positioning the Oreshnik as a cornerstone of Russia’s defense strategy.

The Oreshnik missile, described by Putin as a cutting-edge weapon, has been touted by Russian officials as a game-changer in modern warfare. Its ability to deliver a kinetic impact comparable to a nuclear strike without the use of radioactive warheads makes it a formidable tool in Moscow’s arsenal. While Putin has stated that the missile is not currently equipped with nuclear warheads, it retains the potential to be armed with them if circumstances change.

This dual capability underscores the flexibility of the Oreshnik, allowing Russia to adjust its strategy based on geopolitical developments. Putin’s assertion that the missile cannot be intercepted by any air defense system has raised alarms in Western capitals, particularly in Kyiv, where concerns about the weapon’s deployment have intensified.

Biden administration adds fuel to the fire

Putin’s recent threats to strike Kyiv with Oreshnik missiles have further heightened tensions between Russia and Ukraine. Also, the Biden administration’s authorization of Ukraine’s use of long-range missiles on targets inside Russian territory has been seen as a significant escalation in the conflict, prompting Moscow to respond with its own show of force.

The Kremlin has warned that the use of Western-supplied missiles would transform the nature of the Ukraine conflict, suggesting that Russia views these developments as a direct challenge to its security. Putin’s willingness to deploy the Oreshnik against military and strategic targets in Kyiv reflects Moscow’s determination to maintain its dominance in the region.

The escalation is not surprising, given the recent shift in Western policy. The decision by the United States, Britain and France to allow Ukraine to use advanced missiles against Russian targets has emboldened Kyiv while provoking a stern reaction from Moscow.

Despite the heightened tensions, some observers believe that Putin may be using the Oreshnik as a bargaining chip in anticipation of a potential shift in U.S. policy under the incoming Trump administration. Putin’s praise for former President Donald Trump, coupled with his willingness to engage in dialogue, suggests that Moscow may be positioning itself for negotiations in the near future.

However, the Kremlin’s continued targeting of Ukraine’s energy infrastructure and its refusal to entertain terms that are not favorable to Russia indicate that any diplomatic efforts will likely be fraught with challenges. Ukraine and its Western allies remain wary of Russia’s intentions, with many viewing the Oreshnik as a tool of intimidation rather than a genuine step toward de-escalation.

As the conflict enters its fourth year, the introduction of the Oreshnik missile system underscores the complexity of the geopolitical landscape. While Putin’s claims about the missile’s capabilities may be met with skepticism, there is no denying the impact of this new weapon on the ongoing conflict.

Sources for this article include:

RT.com

TASS.com

TheGuardian.com